社会科学
社會科學
사회과학
Journal of Social Sciences
2011年
11期
97~103
,共null页
中国特色 检察监督 修构
中國特色 檢察鑑督 脩構
중국특색 검찰감독 수구
Chinese Characteristics the Prosecution System with Supervision; Perfect andReconstructe
具有中国特色的检察监督制度是我们在理性择取的基础上并加以民族化改造的成果。在我国权力架构中,为弥补一元分立权力结构模式下权力制衡因素的缺失,实质上是借“法律监督”之名,让检察机关担当权力制衡的角色。实践中,检察机关一直强调自身司法机关的属性导致其实际权能限缩于诉讼领域,法律监督演化为诉讼监督,这与检察机关的应然角色不符。拓展检察机关具有权力监督内涵的权能是修构中国特色检察监督的首举之棋,应把检察机关对行政机关的监督落到实处,审判权是检察机关诉讼监督的内容,而不是重点。为使检察机关法律监督功能的行使处在一个合理的限度内,与行政权、审判权保持一种相对协调平衡的状态,扩权之前必先找到适合我国权力结构模式和司法体制的监督检察模式。
具有中國特色的檢察鑑督製度是我們在理性擇取的基礎上併加以民族化改造的成果。在我國權力架構中,為瀰補一元分立權力結構模式下權力製衡因素的缺失,實質上是藉“法律鑑督”之名,讓檢察機關擔噹權力製衡的角色。實踐中,檢察機關一直彊調自身司法機關的屬性導緻其實際權能限縮于訴訟領域,法律鑑督縯化為訴訟鑑督,這與檢察機關的應然角色不符。拓展檢察機關具有權力鑑督內涵的權能是脩構中國特色檢察鑑督的首舉之棋,應把檢察機關對行政機關的鑑督落到實處,審判權是檢察機關訴訟鑑督的內容,而不是重點。為使檢察機關法律鑑督功能的行使處在一箇閤理的限度內,與行政權、審判權保持一種相對協調平衡的狀態,擴權之前必先找到適閤我國權力結構模式和司法體製的鑑督檢察模式。
구유중국특색적검찰감독제도시아문재이성택취적기출상병가이민족화개조적성과。재아국권력가구중,위미보일원분립권력결구모식하권력제형인소적결실,실질상시차“법률감독”지명,양검찰궤관담당권력제형적각색。실천중,검찰궤관일직강조자신사법궤관적속성도치기실제권능한축우소송영역,법률감독연화위소송감독,저여검찰궤관적응연각색불부。탁전검찰궤관구유권력감독내함적권능시수구중국특색검찰감독적수거지기,응파검찰궤관대행정궤관적감독락도실처,심판권시검찰궤관소송감독적내용,이불시중점。위사검찰궤관법률감독공능적행사처재일개합리적한도내,여행정권、심판권보지일충상대협조평형적상태,확권지전필선조도괄합아국권력결구모식화사법체제적감독검찰모식。
The Prosecution system with supervision of Chinese characteristics is our the results of nationalization on the basis of rational choice and transform. In our power structure, in order to compensate for lack of the balance of powers in Single power structure , in essence, by " legal supervision" in the name, let Prosecution play the role of the balance of powers. In practice, Prosecution has been stressed that he is the judiciary lead to reduction in actual litigation, litigation oversight for the evolution of legal supervision, which is not match the role of the prosecution. The development with the power to monitoring other power is the most important thing of the Chinese characteristics Prosecution system, we should put the supervision of the executive in an important position, judicial supervision is one of the prosecution proceedings, rather than the focus. To enable the prosecution of legal oversight functions exercised in a reasonable extent, and maintaining a relatively balanced state with the executive power and judicial, we should find a suitable structure model to Supervision of the prosecution before expanding our power.