中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2011年
10期
121~128
,共null页
主体功能区 协调发展 十二五规划
主體功能區 協調髮展 十二五規劃
주체공능구 협조발전 십이오규화
major functional zone ; coordinated development ; the 12th Five Year Plan
当前我国的区域发展不平衡问题日益凸显，国家“十一五”规划中出台的主体功能区战略试图根据一些理想的条件和标准对我国区域空间进行合理的重新划分和建构，从而达到促进我国区域协调发展的目的。决策层对区域协调发展的关注从草期狭义上更多地单纯强调经济发展的人民生活水平差距的逐渐缩小。后来逐渐扩展到广义上的区际实际收入水平和公共服务的均等化过程。根据中国2001—2009年的数据，我们发现无论是狭义上还是广义上，我国区际发展不协调程度都呈现扩大趋势，并且广义的区域不协调程度远超过狭义的区域不协调程度。主体功能区战略是逻辑意义上的以地为本，同时也是对区域过去发展水平的一个事后承认或被动承认，中国区域经济的发展水平与主体功能区的开发顺序和开发重点形成了相互促进的同向递增关系。主体功能区的划分标准有着较大随意性和不严谨性，加上相关配套政策和措施的不完善，主体功能区建设短时期内不会缩小反而可能会加大我国本已不小的区际发展差距。
噹前我國的區域髮展不平衡問題日益凸顯，國傢“十一五”規劃中齣檯的主體功能區戰略試圖根據一些理想的條件和標準對我國區域空間進行閤理的重新劃分和建構，從而達到促進我國區域協調髮展的目的。決策層對區域協調髮展的關註從草期狹義上更多地單純彊調經濟髮展的人民生活水平差距的逐漸縮小。後來逐漸擴展到廣義上的區際實際收入水平和公共服務的均等化過程。根據中國2001—2009年的數據，我們髮現無論是狹義上還是廣義上，我國區際髮展不協調程度都呈現擴大趨勢，併且廣義的區域不協調程度遠超過狹義的區域不協調程度。主體功能區戰略是邏輯意義上的以地為本，同時也是對區域過去髮展水平的一箇事後承認或被動承認，中國區域經濟的髮展水平與主體功能區的開髮順序和開髮重點形成瞭相互促進的同嚮遞增關繫。主體功能區的劃分標準有著較大隨意性和不嚴謹性，加上相關配套政策和措施的不完善，主體功能區建設短時期內不會縮小反而可能會加大我國本已不小的區際髮展差距。
당전아국적구역발전불평형문제일익철현，국가“십일오”규화중출태적주체공능구전략시도근거일사이상적조건화표준대아국구역공간진행합리적중신화분화건구，종이체도촉진아국구역협조발전적목적。결책층대구역협조발전적관주종초기협의상경다지단순강조경제발전적인민생활수평차거적축점축소。후래축점확전도엄의상적구제실제수입수평화공공복무적균등화과정。근거중국2001—2009년적수거，아문발현무론시협의상환시엄의상，아국구제발전불협조정도도정현확대추세，병차엄의적구역불협조정도원초과협의적구역불협조정도。주체공능구전략시라집의의상적이지위본，동시야시대구역과거발전수평적일개사후승인혹피동승인，중국구역경제적발전수평여주체공능구적개발순서화개발중점형성료상호촉진적동향체증관계。주체공능구적화분표준유착교대수의성화불엄근성，가상상관배투정책화조시적불완선，주체공능구건설단시기내불회축소반이가능회가대아국본이불소적구제발전차거。
The regional imbalance development in China has arisen gradually, so major functional zoning strategy was put forward in China＇s the Eleventh Five Year Plan to rationally re-organize and re-establish the regional spatial allocation, on the basis of some ideal conditions and standards so as to promote the coordinated development of all regions. China＇s policy-makers have extended their concerns on reducing people＇s living standard gap in narrow sense to the equalization process of the interregional actual income level and public services in broad sense. According to the empirical data from the year 2001 to 2009, we found both in narrow sense and in broad sense, the interregional inconsistency degree shows an enlarging trend. Furthermore, the regional imbalance in broad sense is even worse than the regional imbalance in narrow. Major functional zoning strategy is logically land-oriented, and meanwhile it is also a passive admission and post-admission of regional development level. The development sequence and focus of regional economy and the development level of regional economy have formed the cumulative causation. Due to the arbitrary and imprecise division standards of major functional zones and the imperfect supporting policies and facilities, the construction of major functional zones will not narrow but probably enlarge the interregional development gap in a short time.
