浙江师范大学学报:社会科学版
浙江師範大學學報:社會科學版
절강사범대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Zhejiang Normal University:Social Sciences
2011年
6期
87~93
,共null页
前理解 社会的公众愿望 公共政策和刑事政策 理性化
前理解 社會的公衆願望 公共政策和刑事政策 理性化
전리해 사회적공음원망 공공정책화형사정책 이성화
pre-understanding; public desire from society; public policy and criminal policy; rationality
前理解影响着刑法解释,进而影响着刑法解释限度。有效制约前理解对刑法解释限度探询的消极影响,发挥前理解对刑法解释限度探询的积极作用,需要我们将前理解理性化。社会公众愿望对刑法解释限度的探究发挥着重要作用,但作为说明性理由,不具备正当化能力;考量公众愿望必须在法律标准的范围内,对公众愿望进行理性、合法的吸纳。国家的公共政策和刑事政策对刑法解释限度产生着根本性、实质性的影响,欲控制国家的公共、刑事政策对刑法解释过度的扩张,有必要将公共政策和刑事政策纳入法治的轨道:首先要将公共政策和刑事政策纳入传统刑法法治——权利话语体系之内,以恒久性的权利话语限制随机性的权力关系;其次要结合行为社会危害性的本质,在深思动用刑罚的必要性、可能性和效益性基础上来考虑是否介入政策实盾性的影响.
前理解影響著刑法解釋,進而影響著刑法解釋限度。有效製約前理解對刑法解釋限度探詢的消極影響,髮揮前理解對刑法解釋限度探詢的積極作用,需要我們將前理解理性化。社會公衆願望對刑法解釋限度的探究髮揮著重要作用,但作為說明性理由,不具備正噹化能力;攷量公衆願望必鬚在法律標準的範圍內,對公衆願望進行理性、閤法的吸納。國傢的公共政策和刑事政策對刑法解釋限度產生著根本性、實質性的影響,欲控製國傢的公共、刑事政策對刑法解釋過度的擴張,有必要將公共政策和刑事政策納入法治的軌道:首先要將公共政策和刑事政策納入傳統刑法法治——權利話語體繫之內,以恆久性的權利話語限製隨機性的權力關繫;其次要結閤行為社會危害性的本質,在深思動用刑罰的必要性、可能性和效益性基礎上來攷慮是否介入政策實盾性的影響.
전리해영향착형법해석,진이영향착형법해석한도。유효제약전리해대형법해석한도탐순적소겁영향,발휘전리해대형법해석한도탐순적적겁작용,수요아문장전리해이성화。사회공음원망대형법해석한도적탐구발휘착중요작용,단작위설명성이유,불구비정당화능력;고량공음원망필수재법률표준적범위내,대공음원망진행이성、합법적흡납。국가적공공정책화형사정책대형법해석한도산생착근본성、실질성적영향,욕공제국가적공공、형사정책대형법해석과도적확장,유필요장공공정책화형사정책납입법치적궤도:수선요장공공정책화형사정책납입전통형법법치——권리화어체계지내,이항구성적권리화어한제수궤성적권력관계;기차요결합행위사회위해성적본질,재심사동용형벌적필요성、가능성화효익성기출상래고필시부개입정책실순성적영향.
Pre-understanding affects the interpretation of criminal law, and thus affects the limits of criminal law interpretation. It is necessary to rationalize pre-understanding so as to control effectively its negative impact on and facilitate its positive role in probing into the limits of interpretation. Public desire from society plays an important part in exploring the limits of interpretation of criminal law, but as a descriptive reason, it is not legally justified; public desire must be considered in the scope of legal standards, and it should be in- cluded rationally and legally. National public policy and criminal policy have a fundamental, substantial impact on the limits of criminal law interpretation. In order to control the expansion of excessive interpretation of the state' s public and criminal policy on criminal law, it is necessary to integrate the public and criminal policy into law governance: first, we shall integrate the public and criminal policy into the traditional criminal law governance--power discourse system, with constant power discourse limiting random authority relations; second, considering the nature of behavior which harms the society, we shall decide whether to involve the substantial influence of policy based on the necessity, possibility and the benefits of using penalty.