CAJ | 학술논문

文章剖析了后工业时代社会全球化的历史性变化，包括其如何在风险与不平等的条件下发展并影响人们的日常生活，如何在世界范围内改变社会福利保障的状况及影响公共政策的制定。随着贫富分布不均以及社会阶层化等现象的出现，整个社会的结构正在重新构建，迅速成长的自由市场带动相关经济力量的发展，并伴随着关于理性化、标准化、商品化或是世俗主义思想的扩散。在经济下滑以及劳动力市场的软化的情况下，在全球范围内寻求更完善的社会保障措施的呼声越来越高。如今，原有的20世纪的福利国家形式已被21世纪一种更有竞争力的形态所取代，即所谓“非主权权力”，其在全球范围内越来越受到关注，但在各种社会势力（例如NGOs非政府组织）中对日常生活的影响仍旧较弱。尽管在国际经济发展与社会政策制定之间存在着滞后性，国家政权在跨国公司利益主导的世界范围内还是具有重要的管理功能。在全球化已经影响了社会契约的情况下，社会福利的未来虽难以抉择，但终究是要向着商品化的社会服务方向发展。鉴于公正与治理带来的挑战，文章认为，如今市场经济的走向必须由反映人的根本价值的道德原则来指导，而社会福利保障等概念则需要重新定义和延伸。
문장부석료후공업시대사회전구화적역사성변화，포괄기여하재풍험여불평등적조건하발전병영향인문적일상생활，여하재세계범위내개변사회복리보장적상황급영향공공정책적제정。수착빈부분포불균이급사회계층화등현상적출현，정개사회적결구정재중신구건，신속성장적자유시장대동상관경제역량적발전，병반수착관우이성화、표준화、상품화혹시세속주의사상적확산。재경제하활이급노동력시장적연화적정황하，재전구범위내심구경완선적사회보장조시적호성월래월고。여금，원유적20세기적복리국가형식이피21세기일충경유경쟁력적형태소취대，즉소위“비주권권력”，기재전구범위내월래월수도관주，단재각충사회세력（례여NGOs비정부조직）중대일상생활적영향잉구교약。진관재국제경제발전여사회정책제정지간존재착체후성，국가정권재과국공사이익주도적세계범위내환시구유중요적관리공능。재전구화이경영향료사회계약적정황하，사회복리적미래수난이결택，단종구시요향착상품화적사회복무방향발전。감우공정여치리대래적도전，문장인위，여금시장경제적주향필수유반영인적근본개치적도덕원칙래지도，이사회복리보장등개념칙수요중신정의화연신。
This article explicates how historical changes of globalization play out in terms of risks and inequalities shaping human experience in the post-industrial era, and how they have changed social welfare and public policy making worldwide. In view of inequality and such consequences as planetary poverty and gender stratification, it highlights the reformulation of economic power associated with burgeoning free-market economies and accompanying diffusion of instrumental rationality, standardization, commoditization, or secularism. In contrast with the economic downturn and global softening of labor markets which cry for greater social protection, the welfare state of the last century has been replaced by a competitive state of the 21st century, as a ＂non-sovereign power＂ mindful of its global positioning but less powerful in shaping daily life among social forces including the role of NGOs. Indicating a lag between transnational developments and the way analysts think of social policies, the paper asserts that nation-states nonetheless serve important administrative functions in a world dominated by transnational corporate interests. With few options and having to make hard choices, welfare provision has seen trends toward commodification of social services etc. while globalization is affecting social contracts as well. In considering all the challenges to justice and governance, the authors argue that social welfare needs to be redefined and extended while market economy must be guided by moral principles that embody fundamental httman values.