CAJ | 학술논문

通过对美国研究图书馆协会（ARL）与“高校图书馆事实数据库”的对比分析，发现两者在统计项目界定标准、填报指南、结构、涵盖范围和统计数据分析应用方面存在一定差异。结合国内图书馆统计工作的实际情况，从统计标准、填报说明、统计项目和数据分析应用四个方面为完善“高校图书馆事实数据库”提出相应建议。
통과대미국연구도서관협회（ARL）여“고교도서관사실수거고”적대비분석，발현량자재통계항목계정표준、전보지남、결구、함개범위화통계수거분석응용방면존재일정차이。결합국내도서관통계공작적실제정황，종통계표준、전보설명、통계항목화수거분석응용사개방면위완선“고교도서관사실수거고”제출상응건의。
This paper analyzed the differences between ARL and China National Academic Library Facts Database from the aspects of statistical item standard, fill-in guide, structure, coverage as well as statistical data analysis and application. Combining with the present statistical work of Chinese academic libraries,this paper gave some suggestions on how to improve the China National Academic Library Facts Database in the light of statistic standard, fill-in guide, statistical items and data analysis.