国际贸易问题
國際貿易問題
국제무역문제
Journal of International Trade
2011年
12期
103~113
,共null页
R&D 跨国外溢 国际化渠道 技术进步 吸收能力
R&D 跨國外溢 國際化渠道 技術進步 吸收能力
R&D 과국외일 국제화거도 기술진보 흡수능력
R&D; International spillover; International channel; Technological progress; Absorptive capacity
中国经济的国际化发展已经进入了新阶段,国际化的目标将由生产能力培育转向创新能力培育,因此基于创新知识的跨国吸收与学习是中国产业国际化发展的新目标。论文分析了作为吸收与学习发达国家创新知识的国际化渠道的传递机理,利用1986—2007年主要发达国家和中国经济数据,测算中国全要素生产率、四种国际化渠道吸收外国R&D外溢量,实证比较了中国吸收学习发达国家R&D外溢的四种国际化渠道效果。研究显示:进口、出口、外资和对外直接投资四种国际化渠道都是国际R&D外溢的主要渠道;渠道规模决定了贸易的外溢效应大于投资的外溢效应;基于技术设备中间品进口促进出口的互动贸易模式决定了出口与进口作为吸收外溢的整体贸易渠道更符合实际。调整我国国际化鼓励政策,由经济增长促进目标转为吸收国际创新知识外溢和学习促进的目标,变被动吸收国际知识外溢为主动吸收与学习,这对于提高吸收国际R&D外溢效果具有重要意义。
中國經濟的國際化髮展已經進入瞭新階段,國際化的目標將由生產能力培育轉嚮創新能力培育,因此基于創新知識的跨國吸收與學習是中國產業國際化髮展的新目標。論文分析瞭作為吸收與學習髮達國傢創新知識的國際化渠道的傳遞機理,利用1986—2007年主要髮達國傢和中國經濟數據,測算中國全要素生產率、四種國際化渠道吸收外國R&D外溢量,實證比較瞭中國吸收學習髮達國傢R&D外溢的四種國際化渠道效果。研究顯示:進口、齣口、外資和對外直接投資四種國際化渠道都是國際R&D外溢的主要渠道;渠道規模決定瞭貿易的外溢效應大于投資的外溢效應;基于技術設備中間品進口促進齣口的互動貿易模式決定瞭齣口與進口作為吸收外溢的整體貿易渠道更符閤實際。調整我國國際化鼓勵政策,由經濟增長促進目標轉為吸收國際創新知識外溢和學習促進的目標,變被動吸收國際知識外溢為主動吸收與學習,這對于提高吸收國際R&D外溢效果具有重要意義。
중국경제적국제화발전이경진입료신계단,국제화적목표장유생산능력배육전향창신능력배육,인차기우창신지식적과국흡수여학습시중국산업국제화발전적신목표。논문분석료작위흡수여학습발체국가창신지식적국제화거도적전체궤리,이용1986—2007년주요발체국가화중국경제수거,측산중국전요소생산솔、사충국제화거도흡수외국R&D외일량,실증비교료중국흡수학습발체국가R&D외일적사충국제화거도효과。연구현시:진구、출구、외자화대외직접투자사충국제화거도도시국제R&D외일적주요거도;거도규모결정료무역적외일효응대우투자적외일효응;기우기술설비중간품진구촉진출구적호동무역모식결정료출구여진구작위흡수외일적정체무역거도경부합실제。조정아국국제화고려정책,유경제증장촉진목표전위흡수국제창신지식외일화학습촉진적목표,변피동흡수국제지식외일위주동흡수여학습,저대우제고흡수국제R&D외일효과구유중요의의。
The intemationalization development of China' s economy has entered into a new phase. The aim of internationalization will change from the cultivation of production capacity to innovative ability. Therefore, transnational absorption and study of innovative knowledge become a new goal of internationalization development of China' s economy. This paper analyzes the transferring mechanism of international channel for absorbing and learning the innovative knowledge of developed countries. Based on the economic data of China and some developed countries from the year of 1986 to 2007, the paper calculates the total factor productivity of China and foreign R&D spillovers that absorbed by four international channels. The research makes an empirical comparison of the effect of the four international channels of absorbing developed countries' R&D spillovers. It' s indicated that the four intemational channels, namely, import, export, foreign investment and FDI, are the main channels of intemational R&D spill- over. Secondly, the scale determines whether the spillover effect is greater than investment or not. Moreover, it' s more practical that import of technological equipments promoting export, which as an interactive trade pattern, determines export and import as a whole trade channel of absorbing spillovers. Adjusting our international encouragement policy and changing from passively absorbing international spillovers to an active position has great potential for enhancing the effect of absorbing intemational R&D spillovers.