法制与社会发展
法製與社會髮展
법제여사회발전
Law and Social Development
2012年
1期
98~110
,共null页
案例指导 案例指导制度 判例 判例法
案例指導 案例指導製度 判例 判例法
안례지도 안례지도제도 판례 판례법
case guiding; case guiding system ; precedent ; case law
与两大法系判例制度比较,案例指导制度有鲜明的国情和时代特色,其中最核心的特点是承载司法管理职能和以行政化方式运行。这使案例指导制度内含着难以化解的逻辑难题:统一司法与司法创新、司法多样性及适用案例要旨的冲突;立法权威与指导性案例实践效力的冲突;司法行政化的弱化与强化之困;实施控制措施内部化的硬性与脆性共存;指导性案例与司法解释混同之虞;指导性案例质量与效益不确定等,这些难题加大了推进案例指导的难度,妨碍案例指导制度的落实。减弱现行案例指导的刚性,建立更好地平衡约束和尊重司法自由裁量权为核心的、符合案例作用规律的、更柔性的案例作用机制,有利于案例指导制度走的更好。
與兩大法繫判例製度比較,案例指導製度有鮮明的國情和時代特色,其中最覈心的特點是承載司法管理職能和以行政化方式運行。這使案例指導製度內含著難以化解的邏輯難題:統一司法與司法創新、司法多樣性及適用案例要旨的遲突;立法權威與指導性案例實踐效力的遲突;司法行政化的弱化與彊化之睏;實施控製措施內部化的硬性與脆性共存;指導性案例與司法解釋混同之虞;指導性案例質量與效益不確定等,這些難題加大瞭推進案例指導的難度,妨礙案例指導製度的落實。減弱現行案例指導的剛性,建立更好地平衡約束和尊重司法自由裁量權為覈心的、符閤案例作用規律的、更柔性的案例作用機製,有利于案例指導製度走的更好。
여량대법계판례제도비교,안례지도제도유선명적국정화시대특색,기중최핵심적특점시승재사법관리직능화이행정화방식운행。저사안례지도제도내함착난이화해적라집난제:통일사법여사법창신、사법다양성급괄용안례요지적충돌;입법권위여지도성안례실천효력적충돌;사법행정화적약화여강화지곤;실시공제조시내부화적경성여취성공존;지도성안례여사법해석혼동지우;지도성안례질량여효익불학정등,저사난제가대료추진안례지도적난도,방애안례지도제도적락실。감약현행안례지도적강성,건립경호지평형약속화존중사법자유재량권위핵심적、부합안례작용규률적、경유성적안례작용궤제,유리우안례지도제도주적경호。
Compared with the precedent system of two legal systems, case guiding system has clear char- acteristics of national conditions and the times, the core characteristics of which are to bear function of judicial management and to ran by the way of administrative tendency. These make case guiding system to contain some logic puzzles : the conflict of between judicial unity and judicial innovation, judicial diversity, and appli- cation of case gist, the conflict of between legislative authority and practice effect of guiding case, the conflict of strengthening and weakening of judicatory with administrative characteristic, the coexistence of hardness and brittleness of internal control measures, the worry of confusion between guiding case and judicial interpreta- tion, the uncertainty of quality and efficiency of guiding case, etc. These problem bring a lot of difficulties for promoting case guiding system, and hinder implementation of the system. Weakening the stiffness of case guiding system, and establishing a more flexible case function mechanism which is featured by balancing judicial restraint and respecting judicial discretion, and according with the role law of case, are much more helpful for case guiding system going further and better.