科研管理
科研管理
과연관리
Science Research Management
2012年
1期
96~102
,共null页
科研质量 质量评价 质量改进
科研質量 質量評價 質量改進
과연질량 질량평개 질량개진
scientific research quality; quality evaluation; quality improvement
现行定量科研评价忽视了评价结果对科研质量改进的导向作用,容易对科技领域的创新活动起到负面效果。本文旨在提供一种评价与改进相结合的科研质量评价的思想方法与应用策略。应用因果分析方法,分析了科研质量的构成要素及其内在联系;借鉴学术界在质量评价、科研评价和质量改进领域的相关研究成果,论述了支持改进的科研质量评价的基本原理(内涵、评价目标与准则、评价思路与工作流程);结合我国高校研究机构的基本现状,探讨了支持改进的科研质量评价理论成果的应用难点与实施对策。本文的研究成果,弥补了科研领域的符合性评价与质量奖评价的局限性,也为我国高校研究机构提升科研质量提供了一种新的途径。
現行定量科研評價忽視瞭評價結果對科研質量改進的導嚮作用,容易對科技領域的創新活動起到負麵效果。本文旨在提供一種評價與改進相結閤的科研質量評價的思想方法與應用策略。應用因果分析方法,分析瞭科研質量的構成要素及其內在聯繫;藉鑒學術界在質量評價、科研評價和質量改進領域的相關研究成果,論述瞭支持改進的科研質量評價的基本原理(內涵、評價目標與準則、評價思路與工作流程);結閤我國高校研究機構的基本現狀,探討瞭支持改進的科研質量評價理論成果的應用難點與實施對策。本文的研究成果,瀰補瞭科研領域的符閤性評價與質量獎評價的跼限性,也為我國高校研究機構提升科研質量提供瞭一種新的途徑。
현행정량과연평개홀시료평개결과대과연질량개진적도향작용,용역대과기영역적창신활동기도부면효과。본문지재제공일충평개여개진상결합적과연질량평개적사상방법여응용책략。응용인과분석방법,분석료과연질량적구성요소급기내재련계;차감학술계재질량평개、과연평개화질량개진영역적상관연구성과,논술료지지개진적과연질량평개적기본원리(내함、평개목표여준칙、평개사로여공작류정);결합아국고교연구궤구적기본현상,탐토료지지개진적과연질량평개이론성과적응용난점여실시대책。본문적연구성과,미보료과연영역적부합성평개여질량장평개적국한성,야위아국고교연구궤구제승과연질량제공료일충신적도경。
Current quantitative scientific research evaluation overlooks the guiding role of its outcome for improving the scientific research quality. It might exert negative effects on the innovation activities of science and technology. The objectives of the study are to propose the thinking method and applied strategies of scientific research quality evaluation with the combination of assess- ment and improvement. By using Causal Analysis ( CA), components of scientific research quality and their relationships were analyzed. And then, in terms of relevant research findings in the field of quality evaluation, scientific research evaluation, and quality improvement, the basic principle of Scientific Research Evaluation to Support Quality Improvement (SRESQI), including the connotations, targets, norms, ideas, and working process, is put forward. Moreover, several obstacles and their correspond- ing suggestions for applying the theoretical achievement of SRESQI in Chinese universities and research institutions according to their status quo are discussed. The achievement might compensate for the limitations of conformity assessments and quality awards in this field, and provide Chinese universities and research institutions with a new approach to improve on scientific research quality.