中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2012年
1期
103~110
,共null页
土地 社会经济效益 生态环境效益 耦合关系 熵值赋权法
土地 社會經濟效益 生態環境效益 耦閤關繫 熵值賦權法
토지 사회경제효익 생태배경효익 우합관계 적치부권법
land; socio-economic benefits; eco-environment benefits; coupling relations; entropy weighting approach
新时期,土地利用的属性决定了土地利用能同时产生社会经济效益与生态环境效益,而这两种效益的交互耦合进一步决定了土地利用的整体效益。本研究建立了土地利用的社会经济效益与生态环境效益的耦合模型,设计了分别测度这两种效益的指标体系,用熵值赋权法计算了各指标的权重,进而计算了中国31个省(市、自治区)土地利用中这两种效益的系数及其耦合协调发展系数。结果显示:第一类地区是我国社会经济与生态环境均较好的上海市;第二类地区主要是杜会经济发展较好但生态环境建设相对滞后的地区;第三类是生态环境较好但社会经济发展相对滞后的地区;第四类是社会经济发展相对滞后但生态环境建设更为落后的地区;第五类是生态环境建设滞后但社会经济发展更为落后的地区。最后,对每一个类型的成因和未来发展思路作了说明。在此基础上。又说明了中国土地利用的整体效益仍较为有限、整体效益表现出较为明显的区域分布特征、社会经济与生态环境的协调发展已成为提高我国土地利用效益的现实选择等基本政策含义。
新時期,土地利用的屬性決定瞭土地利用能同時產生社會經濟效益與生態環境效益,而這兩種效益的交互耦閤進一步決定瞭土地利用的整體效益。本研究建立瞭土地利用的社會經濟效益與生態環境效益的耦閤模型,設計瞭分彆測度這兩種效益的指標體繫,用熵值賦權法計算瞭各指標的權重,進而計算瞭中國31箇省(市、自治區)土地利用中這兩種效益的繫數及其耦閤協調髮展繫數。結果顯示:第一類地區是我國社會經濟與生態環境均較好的上海市;第二類地區主要是杜會經濟髮展較好但生態環境建設相對滯後的地區;第三類是生態環境較好但社會經濟髮展相對滯後的地區;第四類是社會經濟髮展相對滯後但生態環境建設更為落後的地區;第五類是生態環境建設滯後但社會經濟髮展更為落後的地區。最後,對每一箇類型的成因和未來髮展思路作瞭說明。在此基礎上。又說明瞭中國土地利用的整體效益仍較為有限、整體效益錶現齣較為明顯的區域分佈特徵、社會經濟與生態環境的協調髮展已成為提高我國土地利用效益的現實選擇等基本政策含義。
신시기,토지이용적속성결정료토지이용능동시산생사회경제효익여생태배경효익,이저량충효익적교호우합진일보결정료토지이용적정체효익。본연구건립료토지이용적사회경제효익여생태배경효익적우합모형,설계료분별측도저량충효익적지표체계,용적치부권법계산료각지표적권중,진이계산료중국31개성(시、자치구)토지이용중저량충효익적계수급기우합협조발전계수。결과현시:제일류지구시아국사회경제여생태배경균교호적상해시;제이류지구주요시두회경제발전교호단생태배경건설상대체후적지구;제삼류시생태배경교호단사회경제발전상대체후적지구;제사류시사회경제발전상대체후단생태배경건설경위락후적지구;제오류시생태배경건설체후단사회경제발전경위락후적지구。최후,대매일개류형적성인화미래발전사로작료설명。재차기출상。우설명료중국토지이용적정체효익잉교위유한、정체효익표현출교위명현적구역분포특정、사회경제여생태배경적협조발전이성위제고아국토지이용효익적현실선택등기본정책함의。
In the new period, the attributes of land use can generate both socio-economic and eco-environmental benefits at the same time, and the interactive coupling of these benefits decides the total benefits of land use. This paper established the coupling model of land use benefits and designed the indexes system that can reflect these benefits. After that, by using entropy weighting approach, the author calculated the weightings of each index, the socio-economic and eco-environment coupling coefficients, and also the coordination development coefficients of 31 provinces in China. The results show that Shanghai is in the first category which is the best area with socio-economy and eco-environment; the second category contains the provinces which are strong in socio-economy comparatively, but lag behind in eco-environment; the third category contains the provinces which are strong in eco-environment comparatively, but lag behind in socio-economy; the fourth category contains provinces which lag behind in socio-economy comparatively, but are even worse in the eco-environment; the fifth category contains the provinces which lag behind eco-envimnment comparatively, and are still worse in the socio-economy. At last, the author explained the reasons and developing orientations of each type, and also the basic conclusions of the evaluation : ( 1 ) the overall benefits level of land use in China is limited. (2) The whole benefits have an obvious regional distribution feature. ( 3 ) The practical choice of promoting land use benefits in China are the coordination of the socio-economy and ecoenvironment.