心理发展与教育
心理髮展與教育
심리발전여교육
Psychological Development and Education
2012年
1期
24~30
,共null页
卢富荣 王侠 李杜芳 张彩 王耘
盧富榮 王俠 李杜芳 張綵 王耘
로부영 왕협 리두방 장채 왕운
儿童 入学准备 学校适应
兒童 入學準備 學校適應
인동 입학준비 학교괄응
children ; school readiness ; school adjustment
对北京市389名儿童入学准备的类型进行研究,探讨不同入学准备类型儿童的特点,并通过追踪数据考察儿童入学准备类型对其一学期后学校适应的影响。结果表明:(1)入学准备可以分为入学准备良好、身体健康和动作技能准备不足、身体健康和动作技能突出/其他领域准备不足和入学准备综合不足四种类型;(2)女生入学准备良好型的比例显著高于男生,而身体健康和动作技能准备不足型、入学准备综合不足型的比例显著低于男生;(3)城区儿童入学准备良好型的比例显著高于郊区,而入学准备综合不足型的比例显著低于郊区;(4)入学准备良好型儿童的学校适应好于身体健康和动作技能准备不足型和入学准备综合不足型,入学准备综合不足型的学校适应最差。
對北京市389名兒童入學準備的類型進行研究,探討不同入學準備類型兒童的特點,併通過追蹤數據攷察兒童入學準備類型對其一學期後學校適應的影響。結果錶明:(1)入學準備可以分為入學準備良好、身體健康和動作技能準備不足、身體健康和動作技能突齣/其他領域準備不足和入學準備綜閤不足四種類型;(2)女生入學準備良好型的比例顯著高于男生,而身體健康和動作技能準備不足型、入學準備綜閤不足型的比例顯著低于男生;(3)城區兒童入學準備良好型的比例顯著高于郊區,而入學準備綜閤不足型的比例顯著低于郊區;(4)入學準備良好型兒童的學校適應好于身體健康和動作技能準備不足型和入學準備綜閤不足型,入學準備綜閤不足型的學校適應最差。
대북경시389명인동입학준비적류형진행연구,탐토불동입학준비류형인동적특점,병통과추종수거고찰인동입학준비류형대기일학기후학교괄응적영향。결과표명:(1)입학준비가이분위입학준비량호、신체건강화동작기능준비불족、신체건강화동작기능돌출/기타영역준비불족화입학준비종합불족사충류형;(2)녀생입학준비량호형적비례현저고우남생,이신체건강화동작기능준비불족형、입학준비종합불족형적비례현저저우남생;(3)성구인동입학준비량호형적비례현저고우교구,이입학준비종합불족형적비례현저저우교구;(4)입학준비량호형인동적학교괄응호우신체건강화동작기능준비불족형화입학준비종합불족형,입학준비종합불족형적학교괄응최차。
389 children have been investigated for their school readiness with two-steps cluster analysis and the differences of school readiness in age, gender and areas, as well as how these profiles predict later school adjustment. It was found as follows: (1) Two-steps cluster analysis revealed four profiles: comprehensive positive development, physical well-being and motor development risk, physical well-being and motor development strengths and other areas risk, school readiness risk. (2) It' s significantly that more girls were the comprehensive positive development type than boys, on the contray, more boys were the physical well-being and motor development risk, as well as school readiness risk profiles. (3) There were more children in urban areas were the comprehensive positive development type than children in suburban areas. The results were contrary in other profiles. (4) The type of comprehensive positive development had higher scores in school adjustment compared with physical well- being and motor development risk and school readiness risk. The profile of school readiness risk performed the worst in school adjustment.