CAJ | 학술논문

本文利用联合国SITC（REV.04）标准和2009年的数据,对中国与东盟产业内贸易指数的分析表明：新加坡、马来西亚、菲律宾、越南、泰国等与中国产业内贸易程度较高,其他东盟成员国与中国的G-L指数较小。Probit模型估计结果显示出中国与东盟产业内贸易的影响因素因行业不同而不同,并不具一致性。如外商直接投资显著促进了东盟与中国初级产品的产业内贸易,但对制造业无明显影响。而教育支出则显著地促进了中国与东盟间规模最大的机械及运输设备（SITC7）行业内贸易,但对其他行业影响不大。
본문이용연합국SITC（REV.04）표준화2009년적수거,대중국여동맹산업내무역지수적분석표명：신가파、마래서아、비률빈、월남、태국등여중국산업내무역정도교고,기타동맹성원국여중국적G-L지수교소。Probit모형고계결과현시출중국여동맹산업내무역적영향인소인행업불동이불동,병불구일치성。여외상직접투자현저촉진료동맹여중국초급산품적산업내무역,단대제조업무명현영향。이교육지출칙현저지촉진료중국여동맹간규모최대적궤계급운수설비（SITC7）행업내무역,단대기타행업영향불대。
Using the United Nations SITC（REV.04） codes and data of 2009,the intra-industry trade（IIT） analysis between China and ASEAN member coun-tries reveals that Singapore,Malaysia,Philippines,Vietnam and Thailand have a higher level of intra-industry trade with China while other ASEAN member coun-tries hold a smaller G-L index with China.The estimation of Probit model shows that IIT factors vary with different industries and there is no consistency to say.For example,foreign direct investment has significantly promoted the in-tra-industry trade of primary products between China and ASEAN but not so of industrial products.Education expenditures have significantly promoted the intra-in-dustry trade of largest machinery and transport equipment industries（SITC7） be-tween China and ASEAN while the effects to other lines are not obvious.