中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2012年
2期
75~79
,共null页
戴洁 胡静 徐璐 陈硕 董亚萍 汤庆合
戴潔 鬍靜 徐璐 陳碩 董亞萍 湯慶閤
대길 호정 서로 진석 동아평 탕경합
中国馆 情景分析法 建筑能耗模型 碳减排效益
中國館 情景分析法 建築能耗模型 碳減排效益
중국관 정경분석법 건축능모모형 탄감배효익
China Pavilion; scenario analysis method; energy consumption model; carbon emission reduction benefit
建筑部门的低碳发展已成为推进我国低碳经济至关重要的一个组成部分。因此正确客观地评价建筑的低碳水平具有熏要的指导意义。本文以2010年上海世博会中国馆为研究对象，采用碳排放情景分析法。针对中国馆的基准建筑与实际建筑，计算其世博结束后正常运行条件下的碳排放水平．评估中国馆实际建筑的碳减排效益。使用建筑能耗模拟软件DesignBuilder对建筑全年能源消耗水平进行了模拟。并通过相应能源品种的碳排放因子分别计算了实际建筑和基准建筑的碳排放水平；同时应用全生命周期方法（LCA）分析了中国馆实际建筑应用太阳能光伏、LED照明技术相比于基准建筑所带来的减排效益。结果表明：世博结束后正常运行条件下，中国馆实际建筑年碳排放量为18969tCO2e。基准建筑年碳排放量为25770tCO2e，因此，相比基准建筑。中国馆实际建筑一年减排6801tCO2e，年碳减排率为26．4％；减排效益主要由节能设计及绿色技术贡献．分别占96．3％和3．7％。本文通过综合评估中国馆的碳减排效益。以期为我国公共建筑低碳工作的开展进行有益的探索。
建築部門的低碳髮展已成為推進我國低碳經濟至關重要的一箇組成部分。因此正確客觀地評價建築的低碳水平具有熏要的指導意義。本文以2010年上海世博會中國館為研究對象，採用碳排放情景分析法。針對中國館的基準建築與實際建築，計算其世博結束後正常運行條件下的碳排放水平．評估中國館實際建築的碳減排效益。使用建築能耗模擬軟件DesignBuilder對建築全年能源消耗水平進行瞭模擬。併通過相應能源品種的碳排放因子分彆計算瞭實際建築和基準建築的碳排放水平；同時應用全生命週期方法（LCA）分析瞭中國館實際建築應用太暘能光伏、LED照明技術相比于基準建築所帶來的減排效益。結果錶明：世博結束後正常運行條件下，中國館實際建築年碳排放量為18969tCO2e。基準建築年碳排放量為25770tCO2e，因此，相比基準建築。中國館實際建築一年減排6801tCO2e，年碳減排率為26．4％；減排效益主要由節能設計及綠色技術貢獻．分彆佔96．3％和3．7％。本文通過綜閤評估中國館的碳減排效益。以期為我國公共建築低碳工作的開展進行有益的探索。
건축부문적저탄발전이성위추진아국저탄경제지관중요적일개조성부분。인차정학객관지평개건축적저탄수평구유훈요적지도의의。본문이2010년상해세박회중국관위연구대상，채용탄배방정경분석법。침대중국관적기준건축여실제건축，계산기세박결속후정상운행조건하적탄배방수평．평고중국관실제건축적탄감배효익。사용건축능모모의연건DesignBuilder대건축전년능원소모수평진행료모의。병통과상응능원품충적탄배방인자분별계산료실제건축화기준건축적탄배방수평；동시응용전생명주기방법（LCA）분석료중국관실제건축응용태양능광복、LED조명기술상비우기준건축소대래적감배효익。결과표명：세박결속후정상운행조건하，중국관실제건축년탄배방량위18969tCO2e。기준건축년탄배방량위25770tCO2e，인차，상비기준건축。중국관실제건축일년감배6801tCO2e，년탄감배솔위26．4％；감배효익주요유절능설계급록색기술공헌．분별점96．3％화3．7％。본문통과종합평고중국관적탄감배효익。이기위아국공공건축저탄공작적개전진행유익적탐색。
Low-carbon development of building sector has been an important part of low-carbon economy in China; thus, it is necessary to assess the low-carbon level of buildings accurately and objectively. This study focused on the carbon emission reduction benefit analysis of China Pavilion in 2010 Shanghai World Expo, based on scenario analysis method by comparing carbon emission level between the actual building and the baseline building for China Pavilion under regular operations after Expo. Energy consumption of both basaline and actual building was analysed with DesignBuilder, an energy consumption modelling software. Then, carbon emission was calculated by multiplying the energy consumption by a corresponding emission factor. Besides, carbon emission reduction benefits of green technologies applied in the actual building, including Solar PV and LED Lighting, were calculated with a life cycle assessment method. It was concluded that under regular operations after Expo, annual carbon emission of the actual building for China Pavilion is 18,969 t CO2e while that of the baseline building is 25,770 t CO2e, which means a reduction of 6,801 t CO2e or reduction ratio of 26.4% ; carbon emission reduction benefits are mainly contributed by green design （ 96.3% ） and green technologies （ 2.7% ）. Therefore, this study is a useful exploration for the development of low-carbon buildings in China.
