南昌大学学报:人文社会科学版
南昌大學學報:人文社會科學版
남창대학학보:인문사회과학판
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2012年
1期
88~91
,共null页
《国家赔偿法》 国家精神损害赔偿 量化标准 立法路径
《國傢賠償法》 國傢精神損害賠償 量化標準 立法路徑
《국가배상법》 국가정신손해배상 양화표준 입법로경
State Compensation for Mental Damages; quantitative standard; legislation path
对于国家精神损害赔偿量化的具体标准,《国家赔偿法》并未作出规定。国家精神损害赔偿数额可通过国家精神损害赔偿三原则、两区分、四酌定因素的量化原则和方法得以确定。三原则为国家精神损害赔偿原则上不低于民事精神损害赔偿原则、数额适当限制原则、法官酌定原则。两区分是区分不同损害的赔偿和区分人身物质性损害赔偿和精神损害赔偿并参照我国人身物质性损害赔偿标准设定具有适度比例和弹性空间的精神赔偿限度。赔偿限度由立法解释规定较为适当。法官在赔偿限度内斟酌四方面的因素确定精神损害赔偿的数额。酌定因素的量化由司法解释规定比较适当。
對于國傢精神損害賠償量化的具體標準,《國傢賠償法》併未作齣規定。國傢精神損害賠償數額可通過國傢精神損害賠償三原則、兩區分、四酌定因素的量化原則和方法得以確定。三原則為國傢精神損害賠償原則上不低于民事精神損害賠償原則、數額適噹限製原則、法官酌定原則。兩區分是區分不同損害的賠償和區分人身物質性損害賠償和精神損害賠償併參照我國人身物質性損害賠償標準設定具有適度比例和彈性空間的精神賠償限度。賠償限度由立法解釋規定較為適噹。法官在賠償限度內斟酌四方麵的因素確定精神損害賠償的數額。酌定因素的量化由司法解釋規定比較適噹。
대우국가정신손해배상양화적구체표준,《국가배상법》병미작출규정。국가정신손해배상수액가통과국가정신손해배상삼원칙、량구분、사작정인소적양화원칙화방법득이학정。삼원칙위국가정신손해배상원칙상불저우민사정신손해배상원칙、수액괄당한제원칙、법관작정원칙。량구분시구분불동손해적배상화구분인신물질성손해배상화정신손해배상병삼조아국인신물질성손해배상표준설정구유괄도비례화탄성공간적정신배상한도。배상한도유입법해석규정교위괄당。법관재배상한도내짐작사방면적인소학정정신손해배상적수액。작정인소적양화유사법해석규정비교괄당。
There is no concrete regulations on quantitative standards of State Mental Damages Compensation in State Compensation Law.State Compensation for Mental Damages may be determined by some quantitative standards and methods,such as "three principles","two distinctions",and "deliberation from four factors "."Three principles" are the state compensation is no less than civil compensation for mental damages in principle,appropriate limitation for compensation amount,judges' deliberation."Two distinctions" are distinction for different damage compensations,and distinction between personal material damage compensation and mental damage compensation.According to Chinese personal material damage compensation standards,it sets a mental compensation limitation with proper ratio and flexible space.Judges should think carefully about four factors in the limitation of compensation to determine the amount of mental damage compensation.It is appropriate to regulate quantitative of deliberation factors through Judicial Interpretation.