教育学报
教育學報
교육학보
Journal of Educational Studies
2012年
1期
67~73
,共null页
程黎 苏世扬 庞亚男 陈静
程黎 囌世颺 龐亞男 陳靜
정려 소세양 방아남 진정
数学 补习教育 补习时间 补习态度 主流教育
數學 補習教育 補習時間 補習態度 主流教育
수학 보습교육 보습시간 보습태도 주류교육
mathematic; supplementary education ; private tutoring time; attitudes to private tutoring mainstream education
补习教育带给家庭和社会一种及其矛盾的情感,它本身不仅是具有深远的经济意义的产业,而且会对社会产生复杂的影响。为了向公众描绘一个更加清晰和全面的关于补习教育的图景,选取北京8所普通小学和5所普通中学的2089名被试,以学校、家庭、个人为背景变量分别探讨影响数学补习次数和态度的因素。结果表明:(1)中等水平学校学生数学补习行为最积极。(2)母亲受教育水平较高,子女参加数学补习行为较积极。(3)小学生参加数学补习时间较多,态度较积极;中等数学水平学生补习态度最积极。(4)Logistic回归分析显示,学校水平、母亲受教育水平和年级对中小学生数学补习时间的累积贡献率为8.5%。分层线性回归分析显示,年级对中小学生数学补习态度的贡献率为4%。
補習教育帶給傢庭和社會一種及其矛盾的情感,它本身不僅是具有深遠的經濟意義的產業,而且會對社會產生複雜的影響。為瞭嚮公衆描繪一箇更加清晰和全麵的關于補習教育的圖景,選取北京8所普通小學和5所普通中學的2089名被試,以學校、傢庭、箇人為揹景變量分彆探討影響數學補習次數和態度的因素。結果錶明:(1)中等水平學校學生數學補習行為最積極。(2)母親受教育水平較高,子女參加數學補習行為較積極。(3)小學生參加數學補習時間較多,態度較積極;中等數學水平學生補習態度最積極。(4)Logistic迴歸分析顯示,學校水平、母親受教育水平和年級對中小學生數學補習時間的纍積貢獻率為8.5%。分層線性迴歸分析顯示,年級對中小學生數學補習態度的貢獻率為4%。
보습교육대급가정화사회일충급기모순적정감,타본신불부시구유심원적경제의의적산업,이차회대사회산생복잡적영향。위료향공음묘회일개경가청석화전면적관우보습교육적도경,선취북경8소보통소학화5소보통중학적2089명피시,이학교、가정、개인위배경변량분별탐토영향수학보습차수화태도적인소。결과표명:(1)중등수평학교학생수학보습행위최적겁。(2)모친수교육수평교고,자녀삼가수학보습행위교적겁。(3)소학생삼가수학보습시간교다,태도교적겁;중등수학수평학생보습태도최적겁。(4)Logistic회귀분석현시,학교수평、모친수교육수평화년급대중소학생수학보습시간적루적공헌솔위8.5%。분층선성회귀분석현시,년급대중소학생수학보습태도적공헌솔위4%。
Supplementary education (private tutoring) families and the societies; it is not only an industry with a far-reaching economic significance, but also would have complex effects on society. In order to present a clear and comprehensive picture of supplemen- tary education to the public, the study recruited 2089 participants from eight ordinary elementary schools and five ordinary middle schools in Beijing, and analyzed the factors that influenced the number and atti- tudes of private mathematic tutoring. The results show that: 1) mid-level students had the highest partici- pation in and the pleasantest attitudes to mathematic supplementary education; 2) students with better ed- ucated mothers had higher participation in and more pleasantest attitudes to mathematic supplementary ed- ucation; 3) 4th grade students had higher participation in and more positive attitudes to mathematic supple- mentary education than 8th grade, and among divided groups of mathematic literacy, the mid-level groups had the most positive attitudes; 4) logistic regression indicated that the overall predictive power of school level, maternal educational level and grade on mathematic supplementary educational time is 8.5% linear regression indicated that the overall predictive power of grade on mathematic supplementary educational at- titude is 4%.