CAJ | 학술논문

民事责任能力在本质上是广义民事行为能力的一种，与狭义民事行为能力即法律行为能力并列，它是当事人对其过错行为承担民事责任的法律前提。广义民事行为能力概念具有深厚的历史根基，我国民法学者对其进行批判是因为对其历史脉络缺乏了解。民事责任能力的认定应采抽象标准与具体认定相结合主义。我国《侵权责任法》第32条存在诸多缺陷，应通过法律解释或修订予以完善。
민사책임능력재본질상시엄의민사행위능력적일충，여협의민사행위능력즉법률행위능력병렬，타시당사인대기과착행위승담민사책임적법률전제。엄의민사행위능력개념구유심후적역사근기，아국민법학자대기진행비판시인위대기역사맥락결핍료해。민사책임능력적인정응채추상표준여구체인정상결합주의。아국《침권책임법》제32조존재제다결함，응통과법률해석혹수정여이완선。
In essence, capacity for civil liability is a kind of capacity for civil disposition in the broad sense. As a premise for the party to bear the liability for his wrongful conduct, capacity for civil liability is different from capacity for civil disposition in the narrow sense which is called capacity for legal transaction. The concept of capacity for civil disposition in the broad sense has a deep historical root that remains unknown to Chinese scholars who criticize this concept. Capacity for civil liability should be judged by abstract criteria and sometimes should also consider concrete factors relating to intelligence of the party. There are sev- eral defects in article 32 of The Tort Law of PRC that should be perfected through revision or legal interpretation.