教育研究
教育研究
교육연구
Educational Research
2012年
3期
75~81
,共null页
基础教育课程改革 中小学教材 教材质量
基礎教育課程改革 中小學教材 教材質量
기출교육과정개혁 중소학교재 교재질량
basic education reform, textbooks for primary and secondary schools, quality of textbooks
随着基础教育课程改革的逐步深入,教材多样化的趋势越来越明显,中小学教材的品种也越来越多,促进了中小学教材质量的提高,但也出现了重复编写同一水平、同一层次教材的现象。对国内各学科有代表性的教材从学生的学习和发展、对教师教学组织的影响、教师或学生对教材的评价三个维度进行动态比较研究发现,各版本新课标教材都能不同程度地体现新课标要求,追求以学生为本,重视探究活动,强调过程与方法等;各版本新课标教材各有优劣,都有修订和改进的空间,主要问题集中在内容容量不当,难度过大,对学生个体差异性、学校差异性以及地区差异性考虑得不够,各个学段之间缺乏有效衔接等方面,教材编制者应当互相借鉴。
隨著基礎教育課程改革的逐步深入,教材多樣化的趨勢越來越明顯,中小學教材的品種也越來越多,促進瞭中小學教材質量的提高,但也齣現瞭重複編寫同一水平、同一層次教材的現象。對國內各學科有代錶性的教材從學生的學習和髮展、對教師教學組織的影響、教師或學生對教材的評價三箇維度進行動態比較研究髮現,各版本新課標教材都能不同程度地體現新課標要求,追求以學生為本,重視探究活動,彊調過程與方法等;各版本新課標教材各有優劣,都有脩訂和改進的空間,主要問題集中在內容容量不噹,難度過大,對學生箇體差異性、學校差異性以及地區差異性攷慮得不夠,各箇學段之間缺乏有效銜接等方麵,教材編製者應噹互相藉鑒。
수착기출교육과정개혁적축보심입,교재다양화적추세월래월명현,중소학교재적품충야월래월다,촉진료중소학교재질량적제고,단야출현료중복편사동일수평、동일층차교재적현상。대국내각학과유대표성적교재종학생적학습화발전、대교사교학조직적영향、교사혹학생대교재적평개삼개유도진행동태비교연구발현,각판본신과표교재도능불동정도지체현신과표요구,추구이학생위본,중시탐구활동,강조과정여방법등;각판본신과표교재각유우렬,도유수정화개진적공간,주요문제집중재내용용량불당,난도과대,대학생개체차이성、학교차이성이급지구차이성고필득불구,각개학단지간결핍유효함접등방면,교재편제자응당호상차감。
Along with the continuous development of basic education reform, the diversified trend of textbooks is becoming more and more obvious, and the variety of textbooks is becoming more diverse, which has improved the quality of textbooks for primary and secondary schools. However, the phenomena of repetitive writing and publishing for the same level and same grade have come into being. With the three dimensional dynamic comparative research on the representative textbooks of different disciplines published in China to examine students" learning and development, the influence of various textbooks on teachers" teaching activities, and the evaluation of textbooks by teachers and students, it is found out that all versions of the textbooks have reflected the requirements of the new curriculum to some degree in promoting student-centered teaching, emphasizing inquiring activities, paying more attention to procedures and methods, etc. All the textbooks have their own merits and demerits, and there is still some room for revision and improvement of the textbooks. The main problems are that the capacity of content is inappropriate, the content is too difficult, and the considerations on students" individual difference, schools" difference, and regional difference are not taken into full account, and the effective transition between different levels of instruction is insufficient, etc. Therefore, the materials writers and textbook compilers should learn from one another and work together.