北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版
北京大學學報:哲學社會科學版
북경대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Peking University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2012年
2期
140~149
,共null页
西方 中国史 中外学术
西方 中國史 中外學術
서방 중국사 중외학술
American China Studies, John K. Fairbank, Paul A. Cohen, Philip C. C. Huang, KennethPomeranz, New Qing History
本文的重点是讨论西方中国学的传承和新潮,侧重分析西方学者如何研究和解释中国的历史。中国改革开放以来,西方学者的中国史研究著作,不断在中国翻译出版,引起了许多注意。一般而言,中国学者对于西方同行层出不穷的新颖观点,颇感兴趣。作者认为,西方研究中国史的学者之所以擅长推陈出新,主要有两个原因。一是他们虽然研究中国史,但其历史研究的观点和方法,则常常受到中国史以外领域的启发。二是他们在材料的开发上面,其实还常常受惠于中国学者和出版界,比如中国档案的开放和编辑出版的原始史料等等。换言之,全球化的高歌猛进,使得学术交流比以往更为便利,因而造成了国际中国史学界新潮迭出的现象。
本文的重點是討論西方中國學的傳承和新潮,側重分析西方學者如何研究和解釋中國的歷史。中國改革開放以來,西方學者的中國史研究著作,不斷在中國翻譯齣版,引起瞭許多註意。一般而言,中國學者對于西方同行層齣不窮的新穎觀點,頗感興趣。作者認為,西方研究中國史的學者之所以擅長推陳齣新,主要有兩箇原因。一是他們雖然研究中國史,但其歷史研究的觀點和方法,則常常受到中國史以外領域的啟髮。二是他們在材料的開髮上麵,其實還常常受惠于中國學者和齣版界,比如中國檔案的開放和編輯齣版的原始史料等等。換言之,全毬化的高歌猛進,使得學術交流比以往更為便利,因而造成瞭國際中國史學界新潮迭齣的現象。
본문적중점시토론서방중국학적전승화신조,측중분석서방학자여하연구화해석중국적역사。중국개혁개방이래,서방학자적중국사연구저작,불단재중국번역출판,인기료허다주의。일반이언,중국학자대우서방동행층출불궁적신영관점,파감흥취。작자인위,서방연구중국사적학자지소이천장추진출신,주요유량개원인。일시타문수연연구중국사,단기역사연구적관점화방법,칙상상수도중국사이외영역적계발。이시타문재재료적개발상면,기실환상상수혜우중국학자화출판계,비여중국당안적개방화편집출판적원시사료등등。환언지,전구화적고가맹진,사득학술교류비이왕경위편리,인이조성료국제중국사학계신조질출적현상。
This article discusses the tradition and trends of China studies in the West, with a focus on the study of Chinese history by Western scholars. Since the 1980s, Chinese publishers have translated and published many studies of Chinese history by Western China scholars. These translations have generated a large readership in Chinese academics. In particular, Chinese scholars have been impressed by various new interpretations and methods advanced by their Western counterparts. Compared with Chinese scholars, the author observes that the work of China scholars in the West has often been inspired by their colleagues specializing in the fields other than Chinese history. He also believes that due to the robust development of globalization, academic exchanges between Chinese and non-Chinese scholars have reached an unprecedented high level, which helps account for the cascades of new ideas in studying Chinese history. Cases in point are the rise of "New Qing History" and the comparative study of Ming-Qing China and its global connections and context in the 17^th and the 18^th centuries.