CAJ | 학술논문

正视封闭公司股东所面临的不同于公众公司的现实，美国公司法律实践日益信赖股东合理期待，常常以小股东权益为中心来界定压制行为，创设和发展了以股东合理期待为基础的股东权益救济制度，并逐渐形成了较为成熟的合理期待认定标准，尽可能地为受到不公平待遇的股东提供广泛的救济，以有效地保护受侵害股东的权益。基于合理期待落空而对股东权益进行救济的美国公司法理念与法律实践值得我们借鉴以完善我国股东权益救济制度。
정시봉폐공사고동소면림적불동우공음공사적현실，미국공사법률실천일익신뢰고동합리기대，상상이소고동권익위중심래계정압제행위，창설화발전료이고동합리기대위기출적고동권익구제제도，병축점형성료교위성숙적합리기대인정표준，진가능지위수도불공평대우적고동제공엄범적구제，이유효지보호수침해고동적권익。기우합리기대락공이대고동권익진행구제적미국공사법이념여법률실천치득아문차감이완선아국고동권익구제제도。
Addressing the different reality of closed corporations from public corporations, legal practices in the U. S. increasingly rely on reasonable expectations of shareholders and often define oppression acts centering on minority share- holders＇ fights and interests, which has created and developed lots of reliefs for aggrieved shareholders＇ rights and interestsbased on their reasonable expectations and has gradually evolved into a more mature standard of judging whether the expec- tations are reasonable or not to provide a broad relief to shareholders suffering unfair treatment as much as possible in order to effectively protect the rights and interests of aggrieved shareholders. We may learn a lot from the U.S. company law con-cepts and legal practices of reliefs based on the frustration of shareholders＇ reasonable expectations to improve the corre- sponding legal rules in China＇ s company law.