CAJ | 학술논문

为了对大学体育课程内容标准体系中具体指标条目进行甄别和筛选。采用德尔菲法对备选的48条具体指标条目进行4轮专家意见征询，有45名高等学校体育教学指导委员会委员，35名大学公体部主任参与专家征询。经2轮预调查和2轮正式征询的专家积极性系数分别为100％、100％、88．75％和77．50％；专家的权威程度达到可接受值（≥0．70）比例为86．7％、100％、87．3％和88．7％；专家意见一致性系数（Kendall’s W，肯德尔和谐指数）分别为0-311、0．628、0．320和0．531；运动参与、运动技能、身体健康、心理健康和社会适应5领域1级指标类的权重分别为12．5％、29．9％、24．7％、22．5％和10．4％。经过2轮的正式征询，最后筛选出5个领域共30个具体指标条目。
위료대대학체육과정내용표준체계중구체지표조목진행견별화사선。채용덕이비법대비선적48조구체지표조목진행4륜전가의견정순，유45명고등학교체육교학지도위원회위원，35명대학공체부주임삼여전가정순。경2륜예조사화2륜정식정순적전가적겁성계수분별위100％、100％、88．75％화77．50％；전가적권위정도체도가접수치（≥0．70）비례위86．7％、100％、87．3％화88．7％；전가의견일치성계수（Kendall’s W，긍덕이화해지수）분별위0-311、0．628、0．320화0．531；운동삼여、운동기능、신체건강、심리건강화사회괄응5영역1급지표류적권중분별위12．5％、29．9％、24．7％、22．5％화10．4％。경과2륜적정식정순，최후사선출5개영역공30개구체지표조목。
In order to identify and screen specific indexes in the college physical education curriculum content standard system, the authors used the Delphi method to carry out 4 rounds of expert opinion consultation on 48 optional specific indexes. 45 members of college physical education teaching guidance committees and 35 directors of college public sports departments participated in expert opinion consultation. After 2 rounds of preliminary investigation and 2 rounds of official consultation, the expert enthusiasm coefficients were 100%, 100%, 88.75% and 77.50% respectively; the percentages of acceptability （t〉0.70） of expert authority were 86.7%, 100%, 87.3% and 88.7%; the expert opinion consistency coefficients （Kendall＇s W harmony index） were 0.311, 0.628, 0.320 and 0.531 respectively; the weights for level 1 indexes in such 5 areas as sports participation, sports skills, physical health, mental health and social adaptation were 12.5%, 29.9%, 24.7%, 22.5% and 10.4% respectively. After 2 rounds of otticial consultation, totally 30 specific indexes in 5 areas were screened out.