CAJ | 학술논문

明清时期《水浒传》研究格局主要由传统的文献学手段、晚明以降的评点式研究、思想评论的二元对立思维模式等方法所支撑。20世纪初以来，现代意义上“水浒学”的形成与丰富，虽然很大程度上归功于对种种西方理论方法的引进与采用，但传统研究方法的优势并没有被完全取代：在《水浒传》的成书、本事、版本及作者等方面，传统的文献学手段依然是最主流、最有效的途径；序跋式批评则在现代《水浒》传播中蜕变为“出版说明”、“前言”、“编者的话”等形式，仍旧发挥着“批评”的功能。20世纪初以来的《水浒传》研究多次被卷入政治斗争，其实也与明清时期《水浒传》思想评论中的二元对立思维模式有着内在的逻辑关联。
명청시기《수호전》연구격국주요유전통적문헌학수단、만명이강적평점식연구、사상평론적이원대립사유모식등방법소지탱。20세기초이래，현대의의상“수호학”적형성여봉부，수연흔대정도상귀공우대충충서방이론방법적인진여채용，단전통연구방법적우세병몰유피완전취대：재《수호전》적성서、본사、판본급작자등방면，전통적문헌학수단의연시최주류、최유효적도경；서발식비평칙재현대《수호》전파중세변위“출판설명”、“전언”、“편자적화”등형식，잉구발휘착“비평”적공능。20세기초이래적《수호전》연구다차피권입정치두쟁，기실야여명청시기《수호전》사상평론중적이원대립사유모식유착내재적라집관련。
The research on Shui Hu in the Ming and Qing tional Chinese philology, the annotative review rising since th thinking dynasties is chiefly done by means of the tradi- e late Ming dynasty, and the binary-opposition mode in ideological criticisms. While the rise of the modern ＂Shui Hu studies＂ since the early 20＇h century has largely been attributed to the introduction and adoption of various Western theories and approa- ches, the traditional Chinese methods have never been deprived of their prestigious statuses： the philological approach proves to be the most popular and effective way for the study of the evolution, origins, editions and authorship of the novel; the paratextual criticism, which used to be common in prefaces and postscripts, have been playing the role of ＂criticism＂ though it has evolved into ＂publisher＇ s notes＂, ＂foreword＂, ＂editor＇ s notes＂ and so on; and the dual thinking underlying factor that has contributed to century. mode in reviewing the novel during the Ming and Qing periods is the the political involvement of studies of the novel since the early 20＇~