求是学刊
求是學刊
구시학간
Seeking Truth
2012年
2期
85~90
,共null页
司法 法律效果 社会效果 规则之治
司法 法律效果 社會效果 規則之治
사법 법률효과 사회효과 규칙지치
judicial; legal effect; social effect; rule-by-regulation
法律效果与社会效果作为司法裁判的二元目标,是法律的规则性、规则的理性与限度之张力在司法实践中的具体表现。在中国司法语境中,社会主义法治是"两个效果有机统一"政策的构成性前提,也是其实践的规定性组成部分。遮蔽于道德理由的规则之治,是一种具有明显优势的社会治理模式,但也有其限度和局限,这是"两个效果有机统一"的践行性前提。相应地,落实"法律效果"就是最大化规则之治的优点与功能,以维系秩序与保障权利;关切"社会效果"则是基于规则适用结果与最优道德判断的不一致性,要求适度返回法律背后的道德理由,平衡法律适用的社会效用。法律效果在法治国家司法中处于优先地位,对社会效果的考量,须设定各种制度与方法约束。唯此才能使司法裁判做到"规范上封闭和认知上开放",真正实现"两个效果有机统一"。
法律效果與社會效果作為司法裁判的二元目標,是法律的規則性、規則的理性與限度之張力在司法實踐中的具體錶現。在中國司法語境中,社會主義法治是"兩箇效果有機統一"政策的構成性前提,也是其實踐的規定性組成部分。遮蔽于道德理由的規則之治,是一種具有明顯優勢的社會治理模式,但也有其限度和跼限,這是"兩箇效果有機統一"的踐行性前提。相應地,落實"法律效果"就是最大化規則之治的優點與功能,以維繫秩序與保障權利;關切"社會效果"則是基于規則適用結果與最優道德判斷的不一緻性,要求適度返迴法律揹後的道德理由,平衡法律適用的社會效用。法律效果在法治國傢司法中處于優先地位,對社會效果的攷量,鬚設定各種製度與方法約束。唯此纔能使司法裁判做到"規範上封閉和認知上開放",真正實現"兩箇效果有機統一"。
법률효과여사회효과작위사법재판적이원목표,시법률적규칙성、규칙적이성여한도지장력재사법실천중적구체표현。재중국사법어경중,사회주의법치시"량개효과유궤통일"정책적구성성전제,야시기실천적규정성조성부분。차폐우도덕이유적규칙지치,시일충구유명현우세적사회치리모식,단야유기한도화국한,저시"량개효과유궤통일"적천행성전제。상응지,락실"법률효과"취시최대화규칙지치적우점여공능,이유계질서여보장권리;관절"사회효과"칙시기우규칙괄용결과여최우도덕판단적불일치성,요구괄도반회법률배후적도덕이유,평형법률괄용적사회효용。법률효과재법치국가사법중처우우선지위,대사회효과적고량,수설정각충제도여방법약속。유차재능사사법재판주도"규범상봉폐화인지상개방",진정실현"량개효과유궤통일"。
Legal effect and social effect are the two aims of judicial verdict and the specific expression of legal regularity,regulating reason and tension of limit in judicial practice.In Chinese judicial context,socialist rule-by-law is the constructive premise of policy of "unification of two effects" and the constitutive part of the regularity of its practice.Rule-by-regulation innate in moral reason is a prerogative social ruling pattern but with limit,which is the practical premise of "unification of two effects".Therefore,to realize"legal effect" is to maximize the merit and function of rule-by-regulation in order to maintain order and protect right.To focus on "social effect" is based on the discrepancy between regulation adaptable result and maximum moral judgment in order to return to the moral reason behind law and balance the social effect of legal adaptability.Legal effect is prior in judicial system in rule-by-law country,and the consideration of social effect should be based on kinds of system and confinement.Only in this way can judicial verdict realize "closed in regulation and open in cognition" and the realization of "unification of two effects".