心理科学
心理科學
심이과학
Psychological Science
2012年
2期
364~368
,共null页
黎建斌 马利军 陶惠斯 池思晓
黎建斌 馬利軍 陶惠斯 池思曉
려건빈 마리군 도혜사 지사효
核心自我评价 外向性 任务重要性 稳定性 成败反馈
覈心自我評價 外嚮性 任務重要性 穩定性 成敗反饋
핵심자아평개 외향성 임무중요성 은정성 성패반궤
Core Self-evaluations; Extraversion; Task Importance; Stability; Successful and failure feedback
采用2(反馈类型:成功、失败)×2(任务重要性:重要任务、不重要任务)×2(外向性:内向、外向)组间设计探讨成败反馈对大学生核心自我评价的影响,以及任务重要性和外向性在其中的调节作用,247名被试随机分配到各实验组中。结果表明:(1)反馈类型、任务重要性和外向性对核心自我评价变化的主效应及三者的交互作用效应均显著。(2)成败反馈与任务重要性对核心自我评价变化存在显著的交互作用;简单效应分析表明,在失败反馈条件下,执行重要任务被试的核心自我评价下降幅度显著大于执行不重要任务被试。(3)成败反馈与外向性对核心自我评价变化存在显著的交互作用;简单效应分析显示,在失败反馈条件下,外向被试核心自我评价的下降幅度显著小于内向被试。(4)在失败反馈条件下,任务重要性和外向性对核心自我评价的变化存在交互作用。
採用2(反饋類型:成功、失敗)×2(任務重要性:重要任務、不重要任務)×2(外嚮性:內嚮、外嚮)組間設計探討成敗反饋對大學生覈心自我評價的影響,以及任務重要性和外嚮性在其中的調節作用,247名被試隨機分配到各實驗組中。結果錶明:(1)反饋類型、任務重要性和外嚮性對覈心自我評價變化的主效應及三者的交互作用效應均顯著。(2)成敗反饋與任務重要性對覈心自我評價變化存在顯著的交互作用;簡單效應分析錶明,在失敗反饋條件下,執行重要任務被試的覈心自我評價下降幅度顯著大于執行不重要任務被試。(3)成敗反饋與外嚮性對覈心自我評價變化存在顯著的交互作用;簡單效應分析顯示,在失敗反饋條件下,外嚮被試覈心自我評價的下降幅度顯著小于內嚮被試。(4)在失敗反饋條件下,任務重要性和外嚮性對覈心自我評價的變化存在交互作用。
채용2(반궤류형:성공、실패)×2(임무중요성:중요임무、불중요임무)×2(외향성:내향、외향)조간설계탐토성패반궤대대학생핵심자아평개적영향,이급임무중요성화외향성재기중적조절작용,247명피시수궤분배도각실험조중。결과표명:(1)반궤류형、임무중요성화외향성대핵심자아평개변화적주효응급삼자적교호작용효응균현저。(2)성패반궤여임무중요성대핵심자아평개변화존재현저적교호작용;간단효응분석표명,재실패반궤조건하,집행중요임무피시적핵심자아평개하강폭도현저대우집행불중요임무피시。(3)성패반궤여외향성대핵심자아평개변화존재현저적교호작용;간단효응분석현시,재실패반궤조건하,외향피시핵심자아평개적하강폭도현저소우내향피시。(4)재실패반궤조건하,임무중요성화외향성대핵심자아평개적변화존재교호작용。
Core self-evaluation ( CSE), a latent and broad personality trait, refers to the fundamental appraisal and judgment one holds for himor herself, and consists of serf-esteem, generalized serf-efficacy, neuroticism and locus of control. At once a newly constructed personality trait and global self-evaluation, CSE has been considered as stable as other traits but to show fluctuation for it is closely tied to contextual stimuli. However, little has been revealed about the stability and variability of CSE. In the present study, the successful and failure feedback paradigm was used to investigate how contextual stimuli ( i. e. , success feedback and failure feedback) influence individuals' CSE and whether this relation can be moderated by task importance and extraversion. A large sample ( N = 1050) pretest with the Introversion-Extraversion Scale and Task Importance Scale was used to discriminate between 135 introverts and 167 extraverts with 247 valid subjects included in the final analysis, and intellect and art ability were found to be the relatively most and least important ability, respectively. 247 college students were randomly assigned to any one of the experimental groups in a 2 (Feedback : success vs. failure) × 2 (Task Importance: important vs. unimportant) × 2 (Extraversion: introversion vs. extraversion) between-group factorial designed experiment. A week after administrating the Core Self-Evaluations Scale (CSES) in a laboratory setting, all subjects completed 10 of the same Raven' s Test items on computers with different cover stories that manipulated the feedback and task impor- tance. The participants were told that the task was one of the most authoritative measures on IQ ( important task) or a test of composition of pictures ( unimportant task). After completing it, all participants received factitious feedback of success or failure, and then finished a second time measure of CSE. The changed score of pretest and posttest on CSE served as dependent variable. ACNOVA results showed that ( 1 ) significant main effects of types of feedback, task importance, extraversion, and the interactive effect of the three on the change of CSE were all found to be significant. (2) The interactive effect of types of feedback and task importance on the change of CSE was found to be significant. The simple main effect showed that the change of CSE in subjects executing important tasks was greater than those executing unimportant tasks in the condition of failure feedback, but not significant in the condition of success feedback. (3) The interactive effect of types of feedback and extraversion on the change of CSE was found to be significant. The simple main effect revealed that change of CSE in introvert subjects was higher than extrovert subjects in the condition of failure feedback, but not significant in the condition of success feedback. (4) In the condition of failure feedback, task importance interacted with extraversion to influence the change of CSE, but this interactive effect was significant only in the condition of failure feedback. In sum, when people faced failure feedback, their appraisal and judgment about themselves would decrease, and this decrease would get larger for introverts if the failure feedback came from an important task. But it was plausible that the effect of contextual feedback on one' s CSE could be moderated by task importance and extraversion. These findings support the view that CSE will show fluctuation when an individual is faced with the negative feedback of important contextual stimuli.