心理科学
心理科學
심이과학
Psychological Science
2012年
2期
396~400
,共null页
压力源 应对方式 高中 大学 追踪研究
壓力源 應對方式 高中 大學 追蹤研究
압력원 응대방식 고중 대학 추종연구
stressors, coping styles, longitudinal study
目的在于探讨个体从高中过渡到大学阶段所面临的压力源和应对方式变化。采用青少年压力源量表和应对方式量表对131名高三学生进行了为期一年的追踪调查。结果表明:个体的压力主要来自学业、未来发展、家庭一经济、自我评价和人际关系五个方面;在人际关系、自我评价和家庭一经济压力上大学阶段得分显著高于高中(P〈.05);在消极应对上男生得分显著高于女生(P〈.05),大学显著高于高中(p〈.05);高中阶段四种应对方式都受到压力的作用,而大学阶段只有消极应对与压力有关。结论:与高中相比,大学的个体面临更多的人际关系、自我评价与家庭一经济压力,他们更倾向采取消极的应对方式;不同阶段压力与应对的关系存在差异。
目的在于探討箇體從高中過渡到大學階段所麵臨的壓力源和應對方式變化。採用青少年壓力源量錶和應對方式量錶對131名高三學生進行瞭為期一年的追蹤調查。結果錶明:箇體的壓力主要來自學業、未來髮展、傢庭一經濟、自我評價和人際關繫五箇方麵;在人際關繫、自我評價和傢庭一經濟壓力上大學階段得分顯著高于高中(P〈.05);在消極應對上男生得分顯著高于女生(P〈.05),大學顯著高于高中(p〈.05);高中階段四種應對方式都受到壓力的作用,而大學階段隻有消極應對與壓力有關。結論:與高中相比,大學的箇體麵臨更多的人際關繫、自我評價與傢庭一經濟壓力,他們更傾嚮採取消極的應對方式;不同階段壓力與應對的關繫存在差異。
목적재우탐토개체종고중과도도대학계단소면림적압력원화응대방식변화。채용청소년압력원량표화응대방식량표대131명고삼학생진행료위기일년적추종조사。결과표명:개체적압력주요래자학업、미래발전、가정일경제、자아평개화인제관계오개방면;재인제관계、자아평개화가정일경제압력상대학계단득분현저고우고중(P〈.05);재소겁응대상남생득분현저고우녀생(P〈.05),대학현저고우고중(p〈.05);고중계단사충응대방식도수도압력적작용,이대학계단지유소겁응대여압력유관。결론:여고중상비,대학적개체면림경다적인제관계、자아평개여가정일경제압력,타문경경향채취소겁적응대방식;불동계단압력여응대적관계존재차이。
With the economy developing and competition increasing, more and more people are experiencing pressure which will lead to psychological and emotional problems. Most researchers suggest that the relationship between stressors and coping styles is a very important issue to study. Moreover, it is meaningful to explore how freshmen change their roles and what stressors they meet because they would face a new environment, change of learning methods, different relationships and so on. These differences will affect an individual' s response. But few longitudinal studies were done to describe how the colony' s stressors and coping styles change with the roles changed. In this paper, we aimed to describe the changes of students' stressors and coping styles with the longitudinal study from high school to college. A random sample of 200 students was tested by the Questionnaire of Adolescence Stressors and Adolescence Coping Style Scale twice. The first data collection from junior high schools was in April 2008 in Beijing. After one year the same students were all freshmen in different colleges. We contacted them by email. Then the second data collection was in April 2009. Finally we got the paired-131-sample (Male = 51, Female = 80). The results of CFA and EFA showed that five dimensions of stressors were from study, interpersonal relations, self-development, family economy and self-evolution. The comparison of the two stages of the same colony found that there were some similarities that the stressors from study and self-development were the most important, and significant differences that the freshmen experienced more stressors from interpersonal relations, self-evolution and family economy. More analysis proved that students in college were more inclined to take the negative coping styles; and the coping styles significantly varied with gender. The re- lationship between high school and college students had changed. With regression analysis, the influences of stressors on coping styles in college were different from high school. To conclude, there were significant differences in individuals' stressors and coping styles from high school to college. Therefore, educators should take different approaches in managing students in different stages, and promote students ' healthy development.