心理学报
心理學報
심이학보
Acta Psychologica Sinica
2012年
4期
478~488
,共null页
个人自立 自我图式 他人图式 积极图式 消极图式
箇人自立 自我圖式 他人圖式 積極圖式 消極圖式
개인자립 자아도식 타인도식 적겁도식 소겁도식
personal self-support; self-schema; other-schema; positive schema; negative schema
根据前期系列研究的结果提出了高个人自立者的自我图式、他人图式均比低个人自立者积极的假设,从外显和内隐两个方面分别设计实验对个人自立高分组和低分组各30名大学生进行了研究,以检验该假设。研究1采用形容词4级评定任务,结果发现:①在反应时指标上,高、低个人自立组的差异不显著;②在评价等级指标上,个人自立高分组对积极词的评价等级显著高于低分组,对消极词的评价等级边缘显著的低于低分组。研究2采用外来情绪Simon任务(extrinsic affective Simon task,EAST),结果发现:①在反应时指标上,在过去自我和将来自我条件下,高、低个人自立组的EAST分数没有显著差异,在现在自我条件下,个人自立高分组的EAST分数显著高于低分组;在过去、现在和将来他人条件下,个人自立高分组的EAST分数均显著高于低分组。②在错误率指标上,高、低个人自立组的差异不显著。总的来看,两个子研究的结果均支持了研究假设。
根據前期繫列研究的結果提齣瞭高箇人自立者的自我圖式、他人圖式均比低箇人自立者積極的假設,從外顯和內隱兩箇方麵分彆設計實驗對箇人自立高分組和低分組各30名大學生進行瞭研究,以檢驗該假設。研究1採用形容詞4級評定任務,結果髮現:①在反應時指標上,高、低箇人自立組的差異不顯著;②在評價等級指標上,箇人自立高分組對積極詞的評價等級顯著高于低分組,對消極詞的評價等級邊緣顯著的低于低分組。研究2採用外來情緒Simon任務(extrinsic affective Simon task,EAST),結果髮現:①在反應時指標上,在過去自我和將來自我條件下,高、低箇人自立組的EAST分數沒有顯著差異,在現在自我條件下,箇人自立高分組的EAST分數顯著高于低分組;在過去、現在和將來他人條件下,箇人自立高分組的EAST分數均顯著高于低分組。②在錯誤率指標上,高、低箇人自立組的差異不顯著。總的來看,兩箇子研究的結果均支持瞭研究假設。
근거전기계렬연구적결과제출료고개인자립자적자아도식、타인도식균비저개인자립자적겁적가설,종외현화내은량개방면분별설계실험대개인자립고분조화저분조각30명대학생진행료연구,이검험해가설。연구1채용형용사4급평정임무,결과발현:①재반응시지표상,고、저개인자립조적차이불현저;②재평개등급지표상,개인자립고분조대적겁사적평개등급현저고우저분조,대소겁사적평개등급변연현저적저우저분조。연구2채용외래정서Simon임무(extrinsic affective Simon task,EAST),결과발현:①재반응시지표상,재과거자아화장래자아조건하,고、저개인자립조적EAST분수몰유현저차이,재현재자아조건하,개인자립고분조적EAST분수현저고우저분조;재과거、현재화장래타인조건하,개인자립고분조적EAST분수균현저고우저분조。②재착오솔지표상,고、저개인자립조적차이불현저。총적래간,량개자연구적결과균지지료연구가설。
Interest in the relationship between personality and the self has a long history. Prior studies showed that individuals have trait-congruency self-schema and that some health-related personality traits are related to positive or negative self-schema. Other-schemas also are important and related to mental health. However, few studies have focused on the relation of personality, self-schema and other-schema. According to previous studies, self-schema and other-schema are assumed to be the cognitive units of personal self-support. Specifically, the present study presumed that the self-schema and other-schema of high personal self-support people would be more positive than those for low personal self-support people. Two studies were designed to test our hypotheses by explicit and implicit experiments, respectively. Sixty undergraduate students selected from a larger pool of 189 students were invited to participate in the two studies. The high and low personal self-support groups both had 30 participants, respectively. Study 1 used the adjective-rated task to explore me relation of personal self-support,self-schema and other-schema at the explicit level. The results revealed that there were no significant different between high and low personal self-support groups on reaction times. The rated grades for positive adjectives in the high personal self-support group were significantly higher than those in the low personal self-support group. In addition, the rated grades of high personal self-support group for negative adjectives were marginally significantly lower than those for the low personal self-support group. In study 2, the relation of personal self-support, self-schema and other-schema were examined at the implicit level using the extrinsic affective Simon task (EAST). The results showed that EAST reaction time scores on past self and future self in high personal self-support group did not significantly differ from comparable scores in the low personal self-support group. EAST reaction time scores on present-self, past-other, present-other, and future-other for the high personal self-support group were significantly greater than for the low personal self-support group. There were no significant differences between the high and the low personal self-support groups on EAST error rate scores. Overall, our hypotheses were supported in both studies. This suggests that individuals with high personal self-support have positive self-schema and other-schema, whereas individuals with low personal self-support have negative self-schema and other-schema.