语言科学
語言科學
어언과학
Linguistic Sciences
2012年
2期
157~172
,共null页
“圪”构形成分 裂变重叠 语义具体化 一音一义
“圪”構形成分 裂變重疊 語義具體化 一音一義
“을”구형성분 렬변중첩 어의구체화 일음일의
ge (圪) words formative split reduplication semantic specialization one syllable for one meaning
很多北方方言,尤其是晋语有一批以"圪/骨/黑/卜"等起首的"圪"类词,其中一部分是两个音节表达一个意义,如"圪料"、"黑浪"、"卜来"等,孙景涛(2008)提出"裂变重叠"的假设可解释这一现象。但也有大量"圪"类词不符合裂变重叠的一般规则。文章以沙河话"圪"类词为主要考察对象,从语音、语义、语法三方面比较了裂变重叠式和非裂变重叠式的"圪"类词,认为后者是以前者为构词框架在"一音一义"模式的推动下发展来的,裂变重叠式的无义音节"圪"发展为了有语法意义的构形成分。跨方言的材料也佐证了这一结论。最后,文章尝试从语音学角度就不同形式的"圪"类成分组合能力的差异做解释。
很多北方方言,尤其是晉語有一批以"圪/骨/黑/蔔"等起首的"圪"類詞,其中一部分是兩箇音節錶達一箇意義,如"圪料"、"黑浪"、"蔔來"等,孫景濤(2008)提齣"裂變重疊"的假設可解釋這一現象。但也有大量"圪"類詞不符閤裂變重疊的一般規則。文章以沙河話"圪"類詞為主要攷察對象,從語音、語義、語法三方麵比較瞭裂變重疊式和非裂變重疊式的"圪"類詞,認為後者是以前者為構詞框架在"一音一義"模式的推動下髮展來的,裂變重疊式的無義音節"圪"髮展為瞭有語法意義的構形成分。跨方言的材料也佐證瞭這一結論。最後,文章嘗試從語音學角度就不同形式的"圪"類成分組閤能力的差異做解釋。
흔다북방방언,우기시진어유일비이"을/골/흑/복"등기수적"을"류사,기중일부분시량개음절표체일개의의,여"을료"、"흑랑"、"복래"등,손경도(2008)제출"렬변중첩"적가설가해석저일현상。단야유대량"을"류사불부합렬변중첩적일반규칙。문장이사하화"을"류사위주요고찰대상,종어음、어의、어법삼방면비교료렬변중첩식화비렬변중첩식적"을"류사,인위후자시이전자위구사광가재"일음일의"모식적추동하발전래적,렬변중첩식적무의음절"을"발전위료유어법의의적구형성분。과방언적재료야좌증료저일결론。최후,문장상시종어음학각도취불동형식적"을"류성분조합능력적차이주해석。
In a number of Northern Chinese dialects, especially Jin Dialects, there are a special class of words called "ge (圪) words", which start with a prefix-like syllable such as ge, gu (骨), hei (黑), bu ( 卜) and so on. Some ge words consist of two meaningless syllables, which can be explained as the result of "split reduplication" proposed by Sun Jingtao (2008). However, there are a great number of ge words which don't correspond with the regulation of split reduplication. To account for this, the paper compares of these two types of ge words from the perspectives of phonology, seman- tics and grammar based on the data of ge words in Shahe Dialect (one of Jin Dialects). The conclusion is that motivated by the basic format of Chinese "one syllable for one meaning", the ge words violating split reduplication develop out of the word-building frame formed by the ge words of split reduplication, and the meaningless syllable ge finally develops into a formative with a grammatical meaning. It is supported by evidence from other Northern Chinese Dialects. In addition, it disscussions why ge rather than other forms become the most active form in a variety of prefix-like syllables.