当代亚太
噹代亞太
당대아태
Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
2012年
2期
59~83
,共null页
“中国学派” 国际关系理论 中西观念 比较 中国现代化
“中國學派” 國際關繫理論 中西觀唸 比較 中國現代化
“중국학파” 국제관계이론 중서관념 비교 중국현대화
＂Chinese School＂ International Relations Theory Chineseand Western Views Comparative Chinese Modernization
构建“中国学派”的国际关系理论是一个歧见丛生、远未成型、前景未卜的话题。即便如此，对于其已经表现出来的具有较大影响的观念基础进行反思并不为时过早。通过从两个角度对“中国学派”背后所体现的观念进行比较，可以发现，“中国学派”面临的观念困境在于：如果我们批判西方作为深层差异之外在表现成果的国际关系理论，是否会株连到该内核的其他优势方面？在主张中国观念价值的同时，如何避免其潜在的弊端与危害？在中国社会改革持续深入的背景下，只有在社会改革的进程中实现了文化、文明和思想层面的崛起及民族精神革新之后，才能为国际关系理论的“中国学派”提供思想的活水源头。换言之，对理论的建构者而言，与其循着西方国际关系理论的弊端而思考建构理论，不如立足于思考中国民众所面临的问题——关于如何塑造强大的积极的个体、如何保持民族持续的发展和进步，进而思考我们理想的世界是什么样的。这些问题虽然看起来与国际关系理论相去稍远，但却能够保证理论应用的品质及其价值维度。
構建“中國學派”的國際關繫理論是一箇歧見叢生、遠未成型、前景未蔔的話題。即便如此，對于其已經錶現齣來的具有較大影響的觀唸基礎進行反思併不為時過早。通過從兩箇角度對“中國學派”揹後所體現的觀唸進行比較，可以髮現，“中國學派”麵臨的觀唸睏境在于：如果我們批判西方作為深層差異之外在錶現成果的國際關繫理論，是否會株連到該內覈的其他優勢方麵？在主張中國觀唸價值的同時，如何避免其潛在的弊耑與危害？在中國社會改革持續深入的揹景下，隻有在社會改革的進程中實現瞭文化、文明和思想層麵的崛起及民族精神革新之後，纔能為國際關繫理論的“中國學派”提供思想的活水源頭。換言之，對理論的建構者而言，與其循著西方國際關繫理論的弊耑而思攷建構理論，不如立足于思攷中國民衆所麵臨的問題——關于如何塑造彊大的積極的箇體、如何保持民族持續的髮展和進步，進而思攷我們理想的世界是什麽樣的。這些問題雖然看起來與國際關繫理論相去稍遠，但卻能夠保證理論應用的品質及其價值維度。
구건“중국학파”적국제관계이론시일개기견총생、원미성형、전경미복적화제。즉편여차，대우기이경표현출래적구유교대영향적관념기출진행반사병불위시과조。통과종량개각도대“중국학파”배후소체현적관념진행비교，가이발현，“중국학파”면림적관념곤경재우：여과아문비판서방작위심층차이지외재표현성과적국제관계이론，시부회주련도해내핵적기타우세방면？재주장중국관념개치적동시，여하피면기잠재적폐단여위해？재중국사회개혁지속심입적배경하，지유재사회개혁적진정중실현료문화、문명화사상층면적굴기급민족정신혁신지후，재능위국제관계이론적“중국학파”제공사상적활수원두。환언지，대이론적건구자이언，여기순착서방국제관계이론적폐단이사고건구이론，불여립족우사고중국민음소면림적문제——관우여하소조강대적적겁적개체、여하보지민족지속적발전화진보，진이사고아문이상적세계시십요양적。저사문제수연간기래여국제관계이론상거초원，단각능구보증이론응용적품질급기개치유도。
There are still a wide range of points of view and much uncer- tainty when it comes to the issue of constructing a ＂Chinese School＂ of international relations theory. Even though this is the case, it is not too early to critically review the relatively influential key concepts that have emerged around a ＂Chinese School＂. Based on a comparison of two perspectives on concepts underlying the ＂Chinese School＂, We find the main conceptual difficulties faced by the School are： If we criticize Western International Relations Theory as having a deep gap in terms of its practical application, do we risk undermining the core advantages of the theory？ As we advocate for Chinese concepts and values, how do we avoid their potential disadvantages and pit- falls？ As Chinese social reforms continue to go deeper, it will only be after the process of reforms exhibits a rise in culture, civilization and thinking and once there is a revitalization of the national spirit that a ＂Chinese School＂ will be able to provide a source of inspiration to international relations theory. In other words, for those constructing theories, rather than considering the drawbacks of Western international relations theory to construct a new theory, it might be better to consider the problems currently faced by the Chinese people-how to build a strong and positive state, how to maintain the development and progress of the Chinese nation, and then to think about what the ideal world might look like for us.
