CAJ | 학술논문

中日之间的钓鱼岛主权争夺由来已久，危机频现。从国际法角度看，三个问题最为相关，即：钓鱼岛是不是“无主地”？日本在二战后是否已将钓鱼岛归还中国？钓鱼岛会如何影响中日在东海的领海和专属经济区划界？厘清这些国际法问题会有助于我们更清晰地认识中日之间在钓鱼岛问题上的主权之争。
중일지간적조어도주권쟁탈유래이구，위궤빈현。종국제법각도간，삼개문제최위상관，즉：조어도시불시“무주지”？일본재이전후시부이장조어도귀환중국？조어도회여하영향중일재동해적령해화전속경제구화계？전청저사국제법문제회유조우아문경청석지인식중일지간재조어도문제상적주권지쟁。
The Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands have brought China and Japan into a bitter dispute for many decades. There are three interrelated questions from the international law perspective, such as whether the islands were terra nullius, whether Japan returned the islands to China after the Japanese defeat in WWII, and how their maritime boundary in the East China Sea should be demarcated according to international law. It is useful for us to acquaint the Sino-Japanese disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands clearly.