山东体育学院学报
山東體育學院學報
산동체육학원학보
Journal of Shandong Institute Of Physical Education And Sports
2012年
2期
43~47
,共null页
肥胖 主观感觉疲劳量表 功能能力 代谢当量 运动强度
肥胖 主觀感覺疲勞量錶 功能能力 代謝噹量 運動彊度
비반 주관감각피로량표 공능능력 대사당량 운동강도
obesity ; ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) ; functional capacity ( F. C. ) ; metabolicequivalents (METs) ; exercise intensity I~'~l ~E~ ~+l- I~.~ ~L~-~ ~ /tl- ~%~/~ =Y:~ ~m rhlz ,t,h t/~ "~ ,-~".
目的:探讨主观感觉疲劳量表(RPE)是否适用于中老年肥胖患者运动处方实施过程中运动强度的监控并分析影响RPE的相关因素。方法:215名中老年肥胖患者,进行递增负荷实验测试功能能力(F.C.,单位为代谢当量METs)和相应的RPE。以70%F.C.完成一次中等强度运动,同时记录患者的RPE值,比较用RPE推测的METs值和用递增负荷实验测得的METs值之间的差别。结果:受试者平均F.C.为6.1±1.8(METs),对应的RPE为15.2±1.6。RPE与BMI、性别、教育程度和抗心律失常药物有一定关联。70%F.C.为4.9±1.1(METs),而用RPE计算的预测值为5.6±1.2(METs),后者较前者高23.1%(P〈0.01)。结论:在中老年肥胖患者实施运动处方的过程中,使用RPE会过高估计其实际运动强度;BMI、性别、教育程度和使用抗心律失常药物是RPE的影响变量。
目的:探討主觀感覺疲勞量錶(RPE)是否適用于中老年肥胖患者運動處方實施過程中運動彊度的鑑控併分析影響RPE的相關因素。方法:215名中老年肥胖患者,進行遞增負荷實驗測試功能能力(F.C.,單位為代謝噹量METs)和相應的RPE。以70%F.C.完成一次中等彊度運動,同時記錄患者的RPE值,比較用RPE推測的METs值和用遞增負荷實驗測得的METs值之間的差彆。結果:受試者平均F.C.為6.1±1.8(METs),對應的RPE為15.2±1.6。RPE與BMI、性彆、教育程度和抗心律失常藥物有一定關聯。70%F.C.為4.9±1.1(METs),而用RPE計算的預測值為5.6±1.2(METs),後者較前者高23.1%(P〈0.01)。結論:在中老年肥胖患者實施運動處方的過程中,使用RPE會過高估計其實際運動彊度;BMI、性彆、教育程度和使用抗心律失常藥物是RPE的影響變量。
목적:탐토주관감각피로량표(RPE)시부괄용우중노년비반환자운동처방실시과정중운동강도적감공병분석영향RPE적상관인소。방법:215명중노년비반환자,진행체증부하실험측시공능능력(F.C.,단위위대사당량METs)화상응적RPE。이70%F.C.완성일차중등강도운동,동시기록환자적RPE치,비교용RPE추측적METs치화용체증부하실험측득적METs치지간적차별。결과:수시자평균F.C.위6.1±1.8(METs),대응적RPE위15.2±1.6。RPE여BMI、성별、교육정도화항심률실상약물유일정관련。70%F.C.위4.9±1.1(METs),이용RPE계산적예측치위5.6±1.2(METs),후자교전자고23.1%(P〈0.01)。결론:재중노년비반환자실시운동처방적과정중,사용RPE회과고고계기실제운동강도;BMI、성별、교육정도화사용항심률실상약물시RPE적영향변량。
Objective : To investigate whether or not ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) is applied for monitoring exercise intensity for middle - to - aged obese patients in exercise prescription and ana- lyze related factors. Mothods:215 middle- to- aged obese patients whose functional capacity (F. C. , unit is metabolic equivalents, METs), as well as RPE, were attained by graded exercise test carried out a medium intensity exercise prescription at 70% F. C. and recorded their RPE values. Then compared the difference of METs attained by graded exercise test and predicted value by RPE. Results:F. C. was 6.1 ± 1.8(METs) and RPE was 15.2 ± 1.6. BMI, sex, level of education and antiarrhythmic drug were related to RPE. 70% F. C. was 4.9 - 1.1 (METs) and predicted value by RPE was 5.6 -1.2 (METs) which was 23.1% higher than the former ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion : U- sing RPE for monitoring exercise intensity for middle -to -aged obese patients in exercise prescrip- tion maybe overestimate actual exercise intensity. RPE was influenced by BMI, sex, level of educa- tion and antiarrhythmic drug.