CAJ | 학술논문

近年来出现了不少用博弈论作为理论工具研究群体决策信息集结问题的文献，这些博弈论文献通过对群体决策过程中群体成员的动机与理性行为进行分析，给出了一些与人们的直觉完全相反的重要结论。文章从决策信息的获取、审议过程中信息的披露、透明性的影响与最优决策规则四个方面对此领域的研究进展进行了系统评述。将基于博弈论的群体决策信息集结研究与经济学、政治学、管理学以及社会心理学领域对群体决策的传统主流研究进行了比较，分析了博弈论作为理论工具研究群体决策信息集结问题的优势，最后指出了现有研究工作存在的不足之处。
근년래출현료불소용박혁론작위이론공구연구군체결책신식집결문제적문헌，저사박혁논문헌통과대군체결책과정중군체성원적동궤여이성행위진행분석，급출료일사여인문적직각완전상반적중요결론。문장종결책신식적획취、심의과정중신식적피로、투명성적영향여최우결책규칙사개방면대차영역적연구진전진행료계통평술。장기우박혁론적군체결책신식집결연구여경제학、정치학、관이학이급사회심이학영역대군체결책적전통주류연구진행료비교，분석료박혁론작위이론공구연구군체결책신식집결문제적우세，최후지출료현유연구공작존재적불족지처。
In recent years a considerable literature group decision-making using the tools of game theory. By has come forth dealing with information aggregation in analyzing group members＇ incentives and rational behav- iors in group decision-making, this game theoretic literature gives out some important insights against people＇ s intu- ition. The research developments in this field are systematically reviewed from four aspects, which are acquisition of decision information, information revelation during deliberation, influence of transparency, and optimal decision rules. The research on information aggregation in group decision-making based on game theory is compared with the traditional mainstream research on group decision-making in economics, politics, management science, and social psychology. And the advantage of using the tools of game theory is analyzed for studying information aggregation in group decision-making. Finally ＂the shortcomings of the existing research are presented.