CAJ | 학술논문

“新旧之争”是作为新诗诗学起点的胡适白话诗学最初引发的反响。以“白话作诗”取代“文言作诗”，首先遇到的是“白话”的合法性以及“文言”的生命力的争论，旧诗渊源深厚的审美成规、惯例又必然导致新旧文体学范式的冲突。这些在胡适诗学接受历史上主要表现为早期的“文白之争”、20年代京沪以胡怀琛为中心、东北以《盛京时报》为中心关于新诗押韵的论争，以及在论争之外的一些积极的回应和反对的声浪。随着时间的推移，其反对的声浪不再是基于旧诗的立场，而是新诗诗美诉求中对传统的重新审视。
“신구지쟁”시작위신시시학기점적호괄백화시학최초인발적반향。이“백화작시”취대“문언작시”，수선우도적시“백화”적합법성이급“문언”적생명력적쟁론，구시연원심후적심미성규、관례우필연도치신구문체학범식적충돌。저사재호괄시학접수역사상주요표현위조기적“문백지쟁”、20년대경호이호부침위중심、동북이《성경시보》위중심관우신시압운적논쟁，이급재논쟁지외적일사적겁적회응화반대적성랑。수착시간적추이，기반대적성랑불재시기우구시적립장，이시신시시미소구중대전통적중신심시。
Hu Shi＇s vernacular Chinese poems as the starting point of the poetics of New Poetry a- roused disputes that were related to the legality of ＂Vernacular Chinese＂ and the vitality of ＂Classical Chinese＂. The two styles with their own features and merits led to some conflicts. The disputes were related to the early conflicts between ＂Vernacular Chinese＂ and ＂Classical Chinese＂ . and controver- sial views over the rhyming rules of New Poetry headed by Hu Huaichen in Shanghai and Beijing and Shengjing Daily in northeast China. The disputes finally led to a reexamination of the tradition in the aesthetic studies of New Poetry.