厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版
廈門大學學報:哲學社會科學版
하문대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Xiamen University(A Quarterly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
2012年
3期
125~132
,共null页
地理标志 中欧地理标志合作协定 对等原则 主权原则
地理標誌 中歐地理標誌閤作協定 對等原則 主權原則
지리표지 중구지리표지합작협정 대등원칙 주권원칙
geographical indications, China-EU Cooperative Agreement of GIs, the principle of reciprocity, the prin-ciples of state sovereignty
正在进行的《中欧地理标志双边合作协定》谈判是我国地理标志保护国际化的重要契机,也为反思我国地理标志制度提供了新的视角。我国和欧盟地理标志制度在立法体系上的差异表现在保护模式的选择、立法宗旨与政策导向、不同制度的配合衔接等方面;在具体制度上的差异表现在适用范围及地理标志定义、注册程序的设计、第三国地理标志的注册和保护、地理标志与商标的关系、保护范围等方面。中欧地理标志制度的差异,主要源自双方的地理标志理念和消费者认知的不同。中欧在进行地理标志合作协定谈判时,必须统筹兼顾双方的立法和实践,以对等原则和主权原则为基础,最大限度求同存异,实现互利共赢的目标。
正在進行的《中歐地理標誌雙邊閤作協定》談判是我國地理標誌保護國際化的重要契機,也為反思我國地理標誌製度提供瞭新的視角。我國和歐盟地理標誌製度在立法體繫上的差異錶現在保護模式的選擇、立法宗旨與政策導嚮、不同製度的配閤銜接等方麵;在具體製度上的差異錶現在適用範圍及地理標誌定義、註冊程序的設計、第三國地理標誌的註冊和保護、地理標誌與商標的關繫、保護範圍等方麵。中歐地理標誌製度的差異,主要源自雙方的地理標誌理唸和消費者認知的不同。中歐在進行地理標誌閤作協定談判時,必鬚統籌兼顧雙方的立法和實踐,以對等原則和主權原則為基礎,最大限度求同存異,實現互利共贏的目標。
정재진행적《중구지리표지쌍변합작협정》담판시아국지리표지보호국제화적중요계궤,야위반사아국지리표지제도제공료신적시각。아국화구맹지리표지제도재입법체계상적차이표현재보호모식적선택、입법종지여정책도향、불동제도적배합함접등방면;재구체제도상적차이표현재괄용범위급지리표지정의、주책정서적설계、제삼국지리표지적주책화보호、지리표지여상표적관계、보호범위등방면。중구지리표지제도적차이,주요원자쌍방적지리표지이념화소비자인지적불동。중구재진행지리표지합작협정담판시,필수통주겸고쌍방적입법화실천,이대등원칙화주권원칙위기출,최대한도구동존이,실현호리공영적목표。
The negotiation on "China-EU Cooperative Agreement of Gls" is a good opportunity for internationalizing China' s GIs and provides a new perspective for reviewing GI protection system in China. China ' s GI system is different from that of EU in terms of legal system, which can be seen in the different choices of protective mode, different purposes in law-making and different orientations of policy-making, different arrangements for compatibility of different legislations. Differences also exist in concrete rules ! which can be seen in scopes of applicability, the definitions of Gls, the design of registration procedure, the registration and protection of foreign GIs, the relation between GIs and trademarks as well as the scope of protection. The differences of GI systems mainly result from different conceptions of GIs and consumers' awareness in China and the EU. During the negotiation on the Cooperative Agreement, all these differences should be taken into care- ful consideration and settled according to the principles of reciprocity and state sovereignty so that the win-win goal can be achieved.