齐鲁学刊
齊魯學刊
제로학간
Qilu Journal
2012年
3期
131~136
,共null页
革命文学 文学研究会 早期共产党人 创造社元老
革命文學 文學研究會 早期共產黨人 創造社元老
혁명문학 문학연구회 조기공산당인 창조사원로
Revolutionary Literature ; the Literary Research Society ; early communists ; Creation Club＇ s senior members
“革命文学”倡导和“无产阶级革命文学”论争有比较长的过程，学界一般将其源头追溯到早期共产党人的革命文学主张。如果把“革命文学”与“无产阶级革命文学”适度区别开来，那么，至少可以清晰地看到三种关于“革命文学”的想象，即文学研究会、早期共产党人、创造社“元老”们分别倡导的“革命文学”。这三种“革命文学”想象彼此有很大的差异，显示了“革命文学”源头的不同建构和意向。对这三种“革命文学”建构与想象的历史分析将突破以往革命文学研究中的某种思维定势，为革命文学研究开拓新的空间和思路。
“革命文學”倡導和“無產階級革命文學”論爭有比較長的過程，學界一般將其源頭追溯到早期共產黨人的革命文學主張。如果把“革命文學”與“無產階級革命文學”適度區彆開來，那麽，至少可以清晰地看到三種關于“革命文學”的想象，即文學研究會、早期共產黨人、創造社“元老”們分彆倡導的“革命文學”。這三種“革命文學”想象彼此有很大的差異，顯示瞭“革命文學”源頭的不同建構和意嚮。對這三種“革命文學”建構與想象的歷史分析將突破以往革命文學研究中的某種思維定勢，為革命文學研究開拓新的空間和思路。
“혁명문학”창도화“무산계급혁명문학”논쟁유비교장적과정，학계일반장기원두추소도조기공산당인적혁명문학주장。여과파“혁명문학”여“무산계급혁명문학”괄도구별개래，나요，지소가이청석지간도삼충관우“혁명문학”적상상，즉문학연구회、조기공산당인、창조사“원로”문분별창도적“혁명문학”。저삼충“혁명문학”상상피차유흔대적차이，현시료“혁명문학”원두적불동건구화의향。대저삼충“혁명문학”건구여상상적역사분석장돌파이왕혁명문학연구중적모충사유정세，위혁명문학연구개탁신적공간화사로。
：The advocacy of ＂Revolutionary Literature＂ and the controversy of ＂Proletarian Revolutionary Literature＂ last for a relatively long process, which most scholars date back its origin to the revolution literary ideas of the early communists. Distinguishing moderately between the concepts ＂Revolutionary Literature＂ and ＂Proletarian Revolutionary Literature＂, then, at least the scholars can clearly see three imaginations of the ＂Revolutionary Literature＂, which are respectively advocated by the Literary Research Society, early communists and the Creation Club ＇ s senior members. The three imaginations of ＂Revolutionary Literature＂ are very different to each other, which showing the different source of construction and intention of the ＂Revolutionary Literature＂. The historical analysis on the constructions and imaginations of three ＂Revolutionary Literature＂ is a breakthrough in the revolutionary literature study, which would surmount a certain mindset and open up new space and ideas for revolutionary literature research.
