太原理工大学学报：社会科学版
太原理工大學學報：社會科學版
태원리공대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
2012年
3期
6~10
,共null页
能动司法 司法能动主义 辨异
能動司法 司法能動主義 辨異
능동사법 사법능동주의 변이
active judiciary; judicial activism; clarification
能动司法在时下中国的司法实务界已经如火如荼地展开,而法学理论界对于能动司法的蕴涵却展露出莫衷一是的极大争议。从一开始,我国法学理论界和法律实务界对能动司法的界定就遗憾地依凭着殊异的理路与立据,从而造生出法学理论界的能动司法与法律实务界的能动司法的争论与对立,二者对于能动司法的讨论并非在同一个意义上展开。对此,唯有通过对能动司法的实质、主体、内容与方式做一番辨异方可厘清。
能動司法在時下中國的司法實務界已經如火如荼地展開,而法學理論界對于能動司法的蘊涵卻展露齣莫衷一是的極大爭議。從一開始,我國法學理論界和法律實務界對能動司法的界定就遺憾地依憑著殊異的理路與立據,從而造生齣法學理論界的能動司法與法律實務界的能動司法的爭論與對立,二者對于能動司法的討論併非在同一箇意義上展開。對此,唯有通過對能動司法的實質、主體、內容與方式做一番辨異方可釐清。
능동사법재시하중국적사법실무계이경여화여도지전개,이법학이론계대우능동사법적온함각전로출막충일시적겁대쟁의。종일개시,아국법학이론계화법률실무계대능동사법적계정취유감지의빙착수이적리로여립거,종이조생출법학이론계적능동사법여법률실무계적능동사법적쟁론여대립,이자대우능동사법적토론병비재동일개의의상전개。대차,유유통과대능동사법적실질、주체、내용여방식주일번변이방가전청。
Nowadays,the judicial practice of active judiciary has been carried forward rapidly,however,the jurist hold very different viewpoint on the connotation of active judiciary and have no consensus about its contents,there is a distinct connection and basis between the academic community and the judicial practice community on the issue of active judiciary since the beginning,which makes the arguments and opposition between them too.The discussion among them is not on the same context.Some clarification on the essence,subject,content and method should be made so that we can solve this problem.
