知识产权
知識產權
지식산권
Intellectual Property
2012年
6期
35~39
,共null页
外观设计 专利权 侵权
外觀設計 專利權 侵權
외관설계 전리권 침권
appearance design; patent right; infringement
近年来，外观设计侵权纠纷已经成为知识产权司法审判的重点。司法实务界就如何界定侵权判断的主体、依据何标准进行侵权判定、如何把握现有设计对侵权判断的影响、外观设计侵权责任应如何认定等方面存在认识分歧和操作差异。从实践角度出发，对相关疑难问题应加以探讨，以利于司法统一原则的实现。
近年來，外觀設計侵權糾紛已經成為知識產權司法審判的重點。司法實務界就如何界定侵權判斷的主體、依據何標準進行侵權判定、如何把握現有設計對侵權判斷的影響、外觀設計侵權責任應如何認定等方麵存在認識分歧和操作差異。從實踐角度齣髮，對相關疑難問題應加以探討，以利于司法統一原則的實現。
근년래，외관설계침권규분이경성위지식산권사법심판적중점。사법실무계취여하계정침권판단적주체、의거하표준진행침권판정、여하파악현유설계대침권판단적영향、외관설계침권책임응여하인정등방면존재인식분기화조작차이。종실천각도출발，대상관의난문제응가이탐토，이리우사법통일원칙적실현。
The infringement of appearance design has become more and more important in the trail of intellectual property in recent years. There are different cognitions and operations in the judicial practice group about the judgment of infringement subject and the related criterion, and about how to control the influence brought by the prior art on the infringement, and how to affirm the responsibility of the appearance design infringement. From the practical perspective, this paper will discuss some relevant difficult problems in order to achieve the uniform judicial principle.
