知识产权
知識產權
지식산권
Intellectual Property
2012年
6期
63~67
,共null页
《专利法》第33条 “修改不得超范围”原则 “禁止反悔”原则
《專利法》第33條 “脩改不得超範圍”原則 “禁止反悔”原則
《전리법》제33조 “수개불득초범위”원칙 “금지반회”원칙
article 33 of Patent Law; ＂amendments shall not go beyond original scope＂ principle; ＂estopper＇ principle
《专利法》第33条规定了“修改不得超范围”原则。但如何理解和适用该原则，专利审查部门与实务界在此原则上存在分歧与争论。例如，关于《专利法》第33条的立法目的之争；关于如何理解“原说明书和权利要求书记载的范围”之争；关于修改原则与修改方式、修改时机之争；关于修改与“禁止反悔”原则的关系之争等。从专利法的原理体系出发，针对上述法律论争做出简要介绍与评论，以期业内全面探讨“修改不得超范围”原则。
《專利法》第33條規定瞭“脩改不得超範圍”原則。但如何理解和適用該原則，專利審查部門與實務界在此原則上存在分歧與爭論。例如，關于《專利法》第33條的立法目的之爭；關于如何理解“原說明書和權利要求書記載的範圍”之爭；關于脩改原則與脩改方式、脩改時機之爭；關于脩改與“禁止反悔”原則的關繫之爭等。從專利法的原理體繫齣髮，針對上述法律論爭做齣簡要介紹與評論，以期業內全麵探討“脩改不得超範圍”原則。
《전리법》제33조규정료“수개불득초범위”원칙。단여하리해화괄용해원칙，전리심사부문여실무계재차원칙상존재분기여쟁론。례여，관우《전리법》제33조적입법목적지쟁；관우여하리해“원설명서화권리요구서기재적범위”지쟁；관우수개원칙여수개방식、수개시궤지쟁；관우수개여“금지반회”원칙적관계지쟁등。종전리법적원리체계출발，침대상술법률논쟁주출간요개소여평론，이기업내전면탐토“수개불득초범위”원칙。
Article 33 of Patent Law gives the principle of ＂amendments shall not go beyond original scope.＂ However, Examination Department and Practical Circle diverge greatly on how to correctly comprehend and properly apply this principle. Especially, the diverges are about the legislative purpose of Article 33, the understanding of the principle, the manner and opporttmity for amendment and the relation of amendment with ＂estoppel＂ principle and so on. This paper provides a brief introduction and comments on the above diverges, and desires that the proper application of the principle of ＂amendments shall not go beyond original scope＂ should be studied in an all-round manner on the basis of the theory and system of the Patent Law.
