林业经济
林業經濟
임업경제
Forestry Economics
2012年
5期
14~19
,共null页
陈晓娜 孙增富 孔令刚 韩新英 王迎
陳曉娜 孫增富 孔令剛 韓新英 王迎
진효나 손증부 공령강 한신영 왕영
集体林权制度改革 改革方式 山东省
集體林權製度改革 改革方式 山東省
집체림권제도개혁 개혁방식 산동성
collective forest tenure reform; Shandong province; equalization in the usufruct offorestland
通过对山东省沈官屯村、任庄村、大青太村和南嵬石村的集体林权制度改革进行实地调查,就改革方式、改革对村民的影响及多种改革的实质和原因进行了分析研究。结果发现,4个案例村均根据村情自主选择了"均林"、"均利"和"均股"的改革方式,村民对本次改革满意度比较高。改革后,村民外出打工的人数及占总人口的比重有所上升,但总体增幅不大;在本村打工的人数及比重显著增加,其中女性打工人数增多,增加幅度在20%以上,打工人员的年龄增大;林地人均总收入有较大幅度增长,但占人均总收入的比重不高,林地收入形式也呈现出了多元化;资源数量、条件差异和控制水平,村民需求、经济发展水平和经济收益等都会不同程度的影响着改革方式的选择,也是多种改革方式并存的重要因素。
通過對山東省瀋官屯村、任莊村、大青太村和南嵬石村的集體林權製度改革進行實地調查,就改革方式、改革對村民的影響及多種改革的實質和原因進行瞭分析研究。結果髮現,4箇案例村均根據村情自主選擇瞭"均林"、"均利"和"均股"的改革方式,村民對本次改革滿意度比較高。改革後,村民外齣打工的人數及佔總人口的比重有所上升,但總體增幅不大;在本村打工的人數及比重顯著增加,其中女性打工人數增多,增加幅度在20%以上,打工人員的年齡增大;林地人均總收入有較大幅度增長,但佔人均總收入的比重不高,林地收入形式也呈現齣瞭多元化;資源數量、條件差異和控製水平,村民需求、經濟髮展水平和經濟收益等都會不同程度的影響著改革方式的選擇,也是多種改革方式併存的重要因素。
통과대산동성침관둔촌、임장촌、대청태촌화남외석촌적집체림권제도개혁진행실지조사,취개혁방식、개혁대촌민적영향급다충개혁적실질화원인진행료분석연구。결과발현,4개안례촌균근거촌정자주선택료"균림"、"균리"화"균고"적개혁방식,촌민대본차개혁만의도비교고。개혁후,촌민외출타공적인수급점총인구적비중유소상승,단총체증폭불대;재본촌타공적인수급비중현저증가,기중녀성타공인수증다,증가폭도재20%이상,타공인원적년령증대;임지인균총수입유교대폭도증장,단점인균총수입적비중불고,임지수입형식야정현출료다원화;자원수량、조건차이화공제수평,촌민수구、경제발전수평화경제수익등도회불동정도적영향착개혁방식적선택,야시다충개혁방식병존적중요인소。
The paper analyzed reform pattern, impacts on farmers, the nature and reason of reform pattern based on the survey data obtained by questionnaire interviewing with the famers at Shenguantun, R.enzhuang, Daqingtai and Nanweishi Village in Shandong Province. The results indicated that 4 case villages indepently choosed the reform pattern of equalization in usufruct, equalization in interests, equalization in share of forestland based on forestland sit- uation of village, the satisfaction of villagers was higher with this reform. After reform, outgoing workers and propor- tion of total population increased slowly; workers at village and proportion of total population significantly in- creased, among them, increase of female workers exceed to 20%, the age of workers was older; the per capita in- come of forestland increased greatly, but proportion of total income was lower, income form was diversified; the choice of reform pattern was influenced in different degree by the resource number, the forest site conditions, the control level of resource, the villager requirement, the economic development level and the economic income.