CAJ | 학술논문

OECD成员国高等教育多样化发展路径及其繁荣,是与它们合理选择符合自己国情的投入模式密不可分的。其典型模式主要有：一是以美国为代表的财政投入、社会投入和个人投入都较高的＂三高模式＂;二是以韩国为代表的＂以社会投入为主,政府投入为辅＂的＂社会主导＂模式;三是以法国为代表的＂政府投入为主的中央集权制＂模式;四是以丹麦等北欧国家为代表的＂国家买单＂模式。它给我们的启示是：在社会快速发展时期,必须保证高等教育投入总量的增长,同时要重视社会投入的作用。
OECD성원국고등교육다양화발전로경급기번영,시여타문합리선택부합자기국정적투입모식밀불가분적。기전형모식주요유：일시이미국위대표적재정투입、사회투입화개인투입도교고적＂삼고모식＂;이시이한국위대표적＂이사회투입위주,정부투입위보＂적＂사회주도＂모식;삼시이법국위대표적＂정부투입위주적중앙집권제＂모식;사시이단맥등북구국가위대표적＂국가매단＂모식。타급아문적계시시：재사회쾌속발전시기,필수보증고등교육투입총량적증장,동시요중시사회투입적작용。
Diversification in higher education development path and prosperity of OECD countries with a reasonable choice in line with their national conditions and input mode are inseparable. There are four typical patterns： firstly, the United States model, which the fi- nancial investment, social investment and personal investment are ＂three tops＂; secondly, a Korea-based representative of ＂society-led model＂ with the higher social investment and gov- ernment investment supplemented; thirdly, France-based representative, called the central- ized system of government investment mode; fourth, Denmark and other Nordic country as the representative of ＂country pay＂ model. It shows that, the country should ensure the to- tal growth of higher education in the rapid development period, and pay attention to the im- portant role of social investment at the same time.