中国高教研究
中國高教研究
중국고교연구
China Higher Education Research
2012年
7期
41~46
,共null页
洪煜 钟秉林 赵应生 张筱茜
洪煜 鐘秉林 趙應生 張篠茜
홍욱 종병림 조응생 장소천
研究生教育 历史沿革 现状问题 改革方向
研究生教育 歷史沿革 現狀問題 改革方嚮
연구생교육 역사연혁 현상문제 개혁방향
graduate education; history of graduate orientation of graduate education education; current issues of graduate education; reform
我国研究生教育起步较早,自民国时期诞生以来,先后经历了初创阶段、规范发展、恢复和稳步发展、快速发展等4个阶段。当前,我国已成为研究生教育大国。但研究生教育仍存在与经济社会发展脱节、入学选拔难以适应高层次人才培养需求、培养质量不高、学位授权制度尚待完善、经费投入保障机制不健全、社会评价机制缺失等诸多问题,改革势在必行。今后,要落实高校招生自主权,提高人才选拔的多样性、有效性;加快学科设置与学位授权制度改革,引导各校研究生教育准确定位和特色发展:优化研究生教育结构。增强对经济社会发展的适应性:加快以导师制为核心的培养模式改革,全面提升研究生教育质量;改革成本分担机制,建立稳定的经费保障机制;进一步完善研究生教育质量评价体系,建立客观公正的评价机制。
我國研究生教育起步較早,自民國時期誕生以來,先後經歷瞭初創階段、規範髮展、恢複和穩步髮展、快速髮展等4箇階段。噹前,我國已成為研究生教育大國。但研究生教育仍存在與經濟社會髮展脫節、入學選拔難以適應高層次人纔培養需求、培養質量不高、學位授權製度尚待完善、經費投入保障機製不健全、社會評價機製缺失等諸多問題,改革勢在必行。今後,要落實高校招生自主權,提高人纔選拔的多樣性、有效性;加快學科設置與學位授權製度改革,引導各校研究生教育準確定位和特色髮展:優化研究生教育結構。增彊對經濟社會髮展的適應性:加快以導師製為覈心的培養模式改革,全麵提升研究生教育質量;改革成本分擔機製,建立穩定的經費保障機製;進一步完善研究生教育質量評價體繫,建立客觀公正的評價機製。
아국연구생교육기보교조,자민국시기탄생이래,선후경력료초창계단、규범발전、회복화은보발전、쾌속발전등4개계단。당전,아국이성위연구생교육대국。단연구생교육잉존재여경제사회발전탈절、입학선발난이괄응고층차인재배양수구、배양질량불고、학위수권제도상대완선、경비투입보장궤제불건전、사회평개궤제결실등제다문제,개혁세재필행。금후,요락실고교초생자주권,제고인재선발적다양성、유효성;가쾌학과설치여학위수권제도개혁,인도각교연구생교육준학정위화특색발전:우화연구생교육결구。증강대경제사회발전적괄응성:가쾌이도사제위핵심적배양모식개혁,전면제승연구생교육질량;개혁성본분담궤제,건립은정적경비보장궤제;진일보완선연구생교육질량평개체계,건립객관공정적평개궤제。
China's Graduate Education was bom in the Republican period, and has gone through four stages: the initial development era, specification development era, recovery and steady development era, rapid development era. At present, Although China has made great scale of graduate education, but there are still many issues in graduate education, such as: remains out of touch with economic and social development, admission selection could not adapt to the needs of training talented students, education quality is unsatisfactory, degree authorization system stiU need to be improved, funding mechanism is imperfect, lack of social evaluation mechanisms. Reform is imperative. In the future, it should be necessary to protect the autonomy of university enrollment; improve the effectiveness and diversity of admission selection; speed up the reform of subject classification and degree authorization system; lead graduate schools to accurate targeting and develop their own characteristics; optimize the structure of graduate education; enhance adaptability to the economic and social development; speed up the reform of graduate education mode which the core is mentoring system; establish a cost-sharing mechanism to gain stable funding; improve graduate education quality evaluation mechanisms to establish an objective and impartial evaluation system.