中国体育科技
中國體育科技
중국체육과기
China Sport Science and Technology
2012年
4期
97~100
,共null页
竞走 优秀运动员 专项能力 评估 conconi场地测试
競走 優秀運動員 專項能力 評估 conconi場地測試
경주 우수운동원 전항능력 평고 conconi장지측시
race zoalking specific ability ; assessment ; conconi test
目的：通过两种测试方法的比较，建立优秀竞走运动员专项有氧能力的场地评价方法。研究对象为国家竞走队运动员8人；方法：采用实验室递增负荷测试和conconi场地测试。结果：实验室递增负荷测试，优秀竞走运动员的最大血乳酸值为11．50±1．51mmol／L，10min乳酸清除率为0．37±0．15，乳酸阈走速为12．44±0．59km／h，心率阈走速为13．30±0．91km／h。通过conconi测试获得的优秀竞走运动员的心率阈值为168．8±3．2次／min，个体无氧阈走速为13．40±0．27km／h;两种测试方法比较，心率阈值不存在显著性差异，个体无氧阈走速也不存在显著性的差异，两组值存在高度正相关。结论：从获取竞走运动员心率阈和个体无氧阈走速方面看，场地corlconi测试可以取代实验室递增负荷测试，且更接近运动实际。
目的：通過兩種測試方法的比較，建立優秀競走運動員專項有氧能力的場地評價方法。研究對象為國傢競走隊運動員8人；方法：採用實驗室遞增負荷測試和conconi場地測試。結果：實驗室遞增負荷測試，優秀競走運動員的最大血乳痠值為11．50±1．51mmol／L，10min乳痠清除率為0．37±0．15，乳痠閾走速為12．44±0．59km／h，心率閾走速為13．30±0．91km／h。通過conconi測試穫得的優秀競走運動員的心率閾值為168．8±3．2次／min，箇體無氧閾走速為13．40±0．27km／h;兩種測試方法比較，心率閾值不存在顯著性差異，箇體無氧閾走速也不存在顯著性的差異，兩組值存在高度正相關。結論：從穫取競走運動員心率閾和箇體無氧閾走速方麵看，場地corlconi測試可以取代實驗室遞增負荷測試，且更接近運動實際。
목적：통과량충측시방법적비교，건립우수경주운동원전항유양능력적장지평개방법。연구대상위국가경주대운동원8인；방법：채용실험실체증부하측시화conconi장지측시。결과：실험실체증부하측시，우수경주운동원적최대혈유산치위11．50±1．51mmol／L，10min유산청제솔위0．37±0．15，유산역주속위12．44±0．59km／h，심솔역주속위13．30±0．91km／h。통과conconi측시획득적우수경주운동원적심솔역치위168．8±3．2차／min，개체무양역주속위13．40±0．27km／h;량충측시방법비교，심솔역치불존재현저성차이，개체무양역주속야불존재현저성적차이，량조치존재고도정상관。결론：종획취경주운동원심솔역화개체무양역주속방면간，장지corlconi측시가이취대실험실체증부하측시，차경접근운동실제。
The purpose of this study was to compare the incremental exercise protocol in the laboratory and of conconi test, and to get the good assessment methods for race walkers ＇ aerobic abilities. Eight national team race walkers volunteered to participate in this study. The results showed that 1 ） From incremental exercise protocol in the laboratory, the maximal values of lactate was 11.50 ±1.51 mmol / L, and 10 min lactic acid clearance rate was 0.37 ± 0.15 ; the velocity on lactate threshold was 12.44±0.59 km/h, and the velocity on heart rate threshold was 13.30 ±0.9 1 km/h 2） From conconi test, the heart rate threshold of the elite race walkers was 168.8±3.2 beats/rain, and the individual anaerobic threshold velocity was 13.40± 0.27km/h. 3） No significant difference was found between the heart rate thresholds in the two tests. And there was no significant difference in individual anaerobic threshold velocity in the two tests and there was a higher positive correlation between them. Conclusion： Conconi test can replace the incremental exercise protocol in the laboratory from the aspect of estimating the anaerobic threshold intensity and show more advantages in practical training.
