CAJ | 학술논문

近代民族国家出现后，共同的社会记忆是国家与社会运作的重要合法性来源，因此，作为人们对过去事件、人物表达崇敬、景仰和怀念行为的纪念空间日益受到重视，因为纪念空间具有调动情感、引发思考、唤起并塑造记忆的功能，与社会记忆之间的关系极为密切。但是，纪念空间与社会记忆之间不是不证自明的关系，两者之间的辩证关系是纪念空间得以存在并发挥塑造社会记忆功能的基础，而且在近代中国，纪念空间的转换与社会记忆的塑造更具有现代性与本土性，这是研究中国记忆不可忽略的关键。
근대민족국가출현후，공동적사회기억시국가여사회운작적중요합법성래원，인차，작위인문대과거사건、인물표체숭경、경앙화부념행위적기념공간일익수도중시，인위기념공간구유조동정감、인발사고、환기병소조기억적공능，여사회기억지간적관계겁위밀절。단시，기념공간여사회기억지간불시불증자명적관계，량자지간적변증관계시기념공간득이존재병발휘소조사회기억공능적기출，이차재근대중국，기념공간적전환여사회기억적소조경구유현대성여본토성，저시연구중국기억불가홀략적관건。
Wang Xiaokui observes that evolving from an interpretive framework of the cultural construction of modern nation states, memory studies has been expanded to encompass the entire realm of modern social culture and provides a possible approach to current cultural issues. Given the corporeality and subjectivity of memory, a multi-disciplinary perspective is necessary to counter a flat and stereotypical tendency in the studies. As far as collective memory is concerned to Hu Heng, amnesia is not the residue of memory; on the contrary, memory results from amnesia. Categorizing collective memories into three forms, he explores the possibility of constructing an amnesia theatre in an effort to establish the connections between past and present, and to make history an integral part in our lives. Chen Yunqian considers social memory an important source of a country and society＇s legitimacy. As concrete sites of social memory, memorial space has gained mounting attention in the recent decades. The dialectics between memorial space and social memory lays the foundation for the former＇s existence and agency. Modern China is found to be a case in point, which has witnessed a quickened sense of modernity and locality in the conversion of memorial space and the construction of social memory.