河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2012年
8期
147~151
,共null页
醉酒驾车 交通肇事罪 行为犯 过失 法定刑
醉酒駕車 交通肇事罪 行為犯 過失 法定刑
취주가차 교통조사죄 행위범 과실 법정형
drive in alcoholic intoxication ; transportation crime ; behavior ,crime ; negative ; legal punishment
刑法修正案(八)有关醉酒驾车的新增规定在完善醉酒驾车的刑法规制的同时,也因其本身的规定导致了刑法理论上的质问。质问包括罪状和法定刑两方面。罪状的质问包括:行为方式、罪过、行为场所的内容,以及新增醉酒驾车犯罪与相关犯罪的竞合关系。在法定刑方面:新增醉酒驾车犯罪的"拘役和罚金"的法定刑太轻导致了新增规定在司法适用中被部分架空,与此同时,还导致了追溯时效和刑事诉讼强制措施适用上的争议。为解释这些置疑,应当在明确新增规定与原有交通肇事罪之间的独立关系的基础上,认可新增规定主观上由过失实施,并对"道路上"进行扩大解释;在刑罚上,并且充分利用非刑罚处理方法,以实现立法初衷。
刑法脩正案(八)有關醉酒駕車的新增規定在完善醉酒駕車的刑法規製的同時,也因其本身的規定導緻瞭刑法理論上的質問。質問包括罪狀和法定刑兩方麵。罪狀的質問包括:行為方式、罪過、行為場所的內容,以及新增醉酒駕車犯罪與相關犯罪的競閤關繫。在法定刑方麵:新增醉酒駕車犯罪的"拘役和罰金"的法定刑太輕導緻瞭新增規定在司法適用中被部分架空,與此同時,還導緻瞭追溯時效和刑事訴訟彊製措施適用上的爭議。為解釋這些置疑,應噹在明確新增規定與原有交通肇事罪之間的獨立關繫的基礎上,認可新增規定主觀上由過失實施,併對"道路上"進行擴大解釋;在刑罰上,併且充分利用非刑罰處理方法,以實現立法初衷。
형법수정안(팔)유관취주가차적신증규정재완선취주가차적형법규제적동시,야인기본신적규정도치료형법이론상적질문。질문포괄죄상화법정형량방면。죄상적질문포괄:행위방식、죄과、행위장소적내용,이급신증취주가차범죄여상관범죄적경합관계。재법정형방면:신증취주가차범죄적"구역화벌금"적법정형태경도치료신증규정재사법괄용중피부분가공,여차동시,환도치료추소시효화형사소송강제조시괄용상적쟁의。위해석저사치의,응당재명학신증규정여원유교통조사죄지간적독립관계적기출상,인가신증규정주관상유과실실시,병대"도로상"진행확대해석;재형벌상,병차충분이용비형벌처리방법,이실현입법초충。
The stipulation related alcoholic intoxication in the (eight) amendment bill of crime law consummates the crime law rules, at the same time, it causes some discussion theoretically because of the stipulation. The discussion includes two aspects: the conviction and legal punishment. The discussion of conviction includes the behavior, the subject and the place, and the relationship between the new stipulation and other crime. The behavior way of new stipulation conflicts with the subjection, which causes the conflict with transportation crime. In legal punishment aspect, the legal punishment of new stipulation is too light, which causes the new crime become vacant. At the same time, it causes the discussion about the charge schedule and the use of compel measure in crime process. In order to explain these doubt, We must clear the independent relation of new stipulation to the transportation crime. The subject of the new additional stipulation is negative. We should explain the "on the path" expansively. We should uses the non-penalty processing method fully, which can realize the legislative original intention.