CAJ | 학술논문

尽管最高人民法院已经以司法解释的形式确立了证明妨碍制度，但由于对证明妨碍制度的法理基础缺乏系统的研究，对证明妨碍制度的适用条件和适用程序的研究也较欠缺。于此证明妨碍的适用更多地交由裁判者自由裁量，可能出现的结果即是裁量权的滥用。必须以证明妨碍的法理为基础对证明妨碍的适用条件和程序进行研究。
진관최고인민법원이경이사법해석적형식학립료증명방애제도，단유우대증명방애제도적법리기출결핍계통적연구，대증명방애제도적괄용조건화괄용정서적연구야교흠결。우차증명방애적괄용경다지교유재판자자유재량，가능출현적결과즉시재량권적람용。필수이증명방애적법리위기출대증명방애적괄용조건화정서진행연구。
Although the Supreme People＇s Court has established the evidence spoliation system by judicial interpretation ,we arc short of the systematic study to the logic of the ceidcnce spoliation. So there are little theory about the condition and the procedure of its application, and this application is resorted the judge＇s discretion . The possible effect is the abuse of the discretion right. This study should be based on the study to the logic of evidence spoliation system.