中南大学学报:社会科学版
中南大學學報:社會科學版
중남대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Central South Huiversity: Social Science
2012年
4期
32~37
,共null页
《自然辩证法》 教科书哲学 恩格斯 辩证法
《自然辯證法》 教科書哲學 恩格斯 辯證法
《자연변증법》 교과서철학 은격사 변증법
Dialectics of Nature;textbook of philosophy;Engels;dialectics
对于《自然辩证法》一书在学术界有截然不同的评价,这些评价都建立在认为《自然辩证法》是一本关于"辩证法"的教科书的基础之上,书的目的在于以自然科学研究成果来论述辩证法的三大规律,进而使人通过掌握辩证法三大规律来掌握辩证法。然而,这样理解并未触及《自然辩证法》的真实涵义。恩格斯的《自然辩证法》是按照从抽象上升到具体的辩证法方式来叙述的,意图通过以辩证法分析自然科学成果这一过程来说明真正的辩证法为何以及人们掌握辩证法的必要性。这样,恩格斯辩证法并非因为实体化而失去了批判性和革命性,而是在研究具体问题的过程中随着问题的不断丰富和深入,辩证法本身也在不断丰富和发展。
對于《自然辯證法》一書在學術界有截然不同的評價,這些評價都建立在認為《自然辯證法》是一本關于"辯證法"的教科書的基礎之上,書的目的在于以自然科學研究成果來論述辯證法的三大規律,進而使人通過掌握辯證法三大規律來掌握辯證法。然而,這樣理解併未觸及《自然辯證法》的真實涵義。恩格斯的《自然辯證法》是按照從抽象上升到具體的辯證法方式來敘述的,意圖通過以辯證法分析自然科學成果這一過程來說明真正的辯證法為何以及人們掌握辯證法的必要性。這樣,恩格斯辯證法併非因為實體化而失去瞭批判性和革命性,而是在研究具體問題的過程中隨著問題的不斷豐富和深入,辯證法本身也在不斷豐富和髮展。
대우《자연변증법》일서재학술계유절연불동적평개,저사평개도건립재인위《자연변증법》시일본관우"변증법"적교과서적기출지상,서적목적재우이자연과학연구성과래논술변증법적삼대규률,진이사인통과장악변증법삼대규률래장악변증법。연이,저양리해병미촉급《자연변증법》적진실함의。은격사적《자연변증법》시안조종추상상승도구체적변증법방식래서술적,의도통과이변증법분석자연과학성과저일과정래설명진정적변증법위하이급인문장악변증법적필요성。저양,은격사변증법병비인위실체화이실거료비판성화혁명성,이시재연구구체문제적과정중수착문제적불단봉부화심입,변증법본신야재불단봉부화발전。
There are large numbers of evaluations toward Dialectics of Nature in the Academic field.All of these evaluations consistently argue that Dialectics of Nature is a textbook about dialectics.The purpose of the book is to discuss the three rules of dialectics through the achievement in natural science,which makes person understand the dialectics through knowing three rules of dialectics.However,this kind of understanding is not consistent with the real intrinsic meaning of Engles’ Dialectics of Nature.In order to explain what the real dialectics is and the importance for people to understand dialectics correctly through analyzing the achievements of natural science.Dialectics of Nature narrates based on the narrating way of dialectics which states from the abstract to the specific.Thus,Engles’ dialectics as well as dialectics itself develops and enriches deeply and significantly through evaluating and researching specific issues instead of the common notion that Engles’ dialectic is substantiated which loses criticality and revolutionary.