北京体育大学学报
北京體育大學學報
북경체육대학학보
Journal of Beijing University of Physical Education
2012年
8期
115~120
,共null页
胜率排名 绝对胜率 出场率 中性权衡胜率差 动态加权胜率
勝率排名 絕對勝率 齣場率 中性權衡勝率差 動態加權勝率
성솔배명 절대성솔 출장솔 중성권형성솔차 동태가권성솔
ranking of winning ratio; absolute winning ratio; playing rates; natural balanced winning ratio differential; dynamic weighted winning ratio
运动员胜率排名算法对于得到受大家认可的公平的、客观的、全面的乒超运动员排名以及促进乒超运动的稳健发展都是非常重要的。首先总结概括了排名胜率算法的整体需求,简要回顾了传统的绝对胜率算法和2008年提出的"中性权衡胜率差"算法,并指出了这两种算法各自的优缺点。然后,为克服"中性权衡胜率差"算法的缺点,提出了一种名为"动态加权胜率"的算法,并对该算法的性能特点加以详细的理论分析。最后,为了验证本文新提出算法的有效性,我们把该算法运用到2009年中国乒乓球俱乐部超级联赛的实战成绩中,并与"中性权衡胜率差"计算结果进行了详细的对比和分析。理论分析和实际应用的结果均表明,新算法优于"中性权衡胜率差"算法,并且完全满足排名胜率算法的整体需求,具有较高的实用价值。
運動員勝率排名算法對于得到受大傢認可的公平的、客觀的、全麵的乒超運動員排名以及促進乒超運動的穩健髮展都是非常重要的。首先總結概括瞭排名勝率算法的整體需求,簡要迴顧瞭傳統的絕對勝率算法和2008年提齣的"中性權衡勝率差"算法,併指齣瞭這兩種算法各自的優缺點。然後,為剋服"中性權衡勝率差"算法的缺點,提齣瞭一種名為"動態加權勝率"的算法,併對該算法的性能特點加以詳細的理論分析。最後,為瞭驗證本文新提齣算法的有效性,我們把該算法運用到2009年中國乒乓毬俱樂部超級聯賽的實戰成績中,併與"中性權衡勝率差"計算結果進行瞭詳細的對比和分析。理論分析和實際應用的結果均錶明,新算法優于"中性權衡勝率差"算法,併且完全滿足排名勝率算法的整體需求,具有較高的實用價值。
운동원성솔배명산법대우득도수대가인가적공평적、객관적、전면적핑초운동원배명이급촉진핑초운동적은건발전도시비상중요적。수선총결개괄료배명성솔산법적정체수구,간요회고료전통적절대성솔산법화2008년제출적"중성권형성솔차"산법,병지출료저량충산법각자적우결점。연후,위극복"중성권형성솔차"산법적결점,제출료일충명위"동태가권성솔"적산법,병대해산법적성능특점가이상세적이론분석。최후,위료험증본문신제출산법적유효성,아문파해산법운용도2009년중국핑퐁구구악부초급련새적실전성적중,병여"중성권형성솔차"계산결과진행료상세적대비화분석。이론분석화실제응용적결과균표명,신산법우우"중성권형성솔차"산법,병차완전만족배명성솔산법적정체수구,구유교고적실용개치。
The ranking of winning ratio algorithm plays an important role in both achieving a fair,scientific,comprehensive,acceptable ranking for players and promoting the stable development for the China Table Tennis Super League.In this paper,the writer has firstly reviewed the requirement of the ranking of winning ratio,and analyzed the advantages and the shortages of both the traditional absolute winning ratio ranking algorithm and the "natural balanced winning ratio differentia" algorithm introduced in 2008.To avoid and reduce the shortages of the prior works,the writer introduces the "dynamic weighted winning ratio" algorithm,and gives the character and the detailed theoretical analysis of that.To check the validity of the new algorithm,the writer adopts the data from the 2009's CTTSL to detailed compare the result between the new algorithm and the "natural balanced winning ratio differentia" algorithm.Both the theoretical analysis and the application have reflected that the "dynamic weighted winning ratio" algorithm is better than the "natural balanced winning ratio differential" algorithm,which can meet the requirement of the ratio ranking algorithm better,and thus has a higher practical value.