地域研究与开发
地域研究與開髮
지역연구여개발
Areal Research and Development
2012年
5期
73~77
,共null页
冰雪旅游 经济增长 协整分析 Granger因果检验 误差修正模型 吉林省
冰雪旅遊 經濟增長 協整分析 Granger因果檢驗 誤差脩正模型 吉林省
빙설여유 경제증장 협정분석 Granger인과검험 오차수정모형 길림성
ice-snow tourism ; economic growth ; cointegration analysis ; Granger causality test ; ECM ; Jilin Province
利用吉林省1985--2010年人均冰雪旅游收入和人均GDP时间序列分别作为衡量冰雪旅游和区域经济增长的指标,对吉林省冰雪旅游与经济增长的关系进行协整分析,并用Granger因果检验,确定两者之间作用方向,在此基础上建立误差修正模型,讨论两者间作用力度。结果表明:吉林省冰雪旅游与区域经济增长存在着协整关系,区域经济增长是冰雪旅游的Granger原因。长期内,冰雪旅游收入每变动1%,经济增长将同向变动0.5097%。从误差修正模型可以得出,短期内冰雪旅游与经济增长之间互相作用力度不大,其中经济增长对冰雪旅游调整作用强于后者对前者的作用力度。
利用吉林省1985--2010年人均冰雪旅遊收入和人均GDP時間序列分彆作為衡量冰雪旅遊和區域經濟增長的指標,對吉林省冰雪旅遊與經濟增長的關繫進行協整分析,併用Granger因果檢驗,確定兩者之間作用方嚮,在此基礎上建立誤差脩正模型,討論兩者間作用力度。結果錶明:吉林省冰雪旅遊與區域經濟增長存在著協整關繫,區域經濟增長是冰雪旅遊的Granger原因。長期內,冰雪旅遊收入每變動1%,經濟增長將同嚮變動0.5097%。從誤差脩正模型可以得齣,短期內冰雪旅遊與經濟增長之間互相作用力度不大,其中經濟增長對冰雪旅遊調整作用彊于後者對前者的作用力度。
이용길림성1985--2010년인균빙설여유수입화인균GDP시간서렬분별작위형량빙설여유화구역경제증장적지표,대길림성빙설여유여경제증장적관계진행협정분석,병용Granger인과검험,학정량자지간작용방향,재차기출상건립오차수정모형,토론량자간작용력도。결과표명:길림성빙설여유여구역경제증장존재착협정관계,구역경제증장시빙설여유적Granger원인。장기내,빙설여유수입매변동1%,경제증장장동향변동0.5097%。종오차수정모형가이득출,단기내빙설여유여경제증장지간호상작용력도불대,기중경제증장대빙설여유조정작용강우후자대전자적작용력도。
Using the time series of per capita ice-snow tourism income and per capita GDP from 1985 to 2010 in Jilin Province as the index to measure the ice-snow tourism development and the economic growth in this region, the relationship between the ice-snow tourism and economic growth was analyzed with the method of cointegration and tested by the Granger causality to identify the reaction direction between the ice-snow and economic growth. And the reaction degree was discussed by the construction of ECM. The results show that the cointegration relation exists between the ice-snow tourism and regional economic growth in Jinlin Province, and the regional economic growth is the Granger causality of ice-snow tourism. For a long period, the variation of 1% in the ice-snow tourism income results in the change of 0. 509 7% in GDP in the same direction. In a short period, the reaction degree be- tween the ice-snow and the economic growth is not high through the analysis of ECM. The degree of economic growth to ice-snow development is higher than the degree of the latter to the former.