CAJ | 학술논문

社论是一种劝说类语篇，对重要事件发表意见、表明态度或立场，以影响读者。但实现社论功能的语言手段如何，特别是中外社论有何差异有待进一步研究。本文以《中国日报》和《纽约时报》的社论语篇为语料，以评价理论为基础，对中外英语报刊社论的介入资源分布特征、这些特征的异同以及原因进行研究，结果发现，《中国日报》倾向于使用限制语篇空间的介入资源，保障其话语的权威性，以高于读者的姿态来引导舆论方向；《纽约时报》则偏好就一般的话题，使用扩展语篇空间的介入资源，强调多声的协商，以与读者平等的姿态出现来对读者提出商议。同时发现，这些特点与中外社论语篇的文化语境密切相关。
사론시일충권설류어편，대중요사건발표의견、표명태도혹립장，이영향독자。단실현사론공능적어언수단여하，특별시중외사론유하차이유대진일보연구。본문이《중국일보》화《뉴약시보》적사론어편위어료，이평개이론위기출，대중외영어보간사론적개입자원분포특정、저사특정적이동이급원인진행연구，결과발현，《중국일보》경향우사용한제어편공간적개입자원，보장기화어적권위성，이고우독자적자태래인도여론방향；《뉴약시보》칙편호취일반적화제，사용확전어편공간적개입자원，강조다성적협상，이여독자평등적자태출현래대독자제출상의。동시발현，저사특점여중외사론어편적문화어경밀절상관。
Editorials are the persuasive discourse and express opinions and views on important issues to influence readers. But it is worth studying that how the function is realized and what differences there are between the editorials of Chinese and foreign newspapers. Based on the Appraisal Theory, this paper makes a contrastive study of the engagement resources in the editorials of the China Daily and The New York Times, with the attempt to reveal the different distribution features of the engagement resources in the editorial discourse of the two newspapers and analyze the factors behind the differences. Through the systematic analysis, the author finds out that China Daily tends to use more contraction resources so as to contract the dialogic space, ensure the dis- course authority and lead the public opinions. The New York Times tends to use more expansion resources so as to expand the di- alogie space, enhance the heteroglossic negotiation and influence the readers with equal standing. It is also found out that these differences are closely related to the cultural context of the editorials of the two newspapers and ideology of the two nations.