中国工业经济
中國工業經濟
중국공업경제
China Industrial Economy
2012年
10期
32~44
,共null页
资本深化 工业化 城市规模 城市劳动生产率
資本深化 工業化 城市規模 城市勞動生產率
자본심화 공업화 성시규모 성시노동생산솔
capital deepening; industrialization; city scale; city labor productivity
提高城市化质量和劳动产出效率是中国未来经济发展的必然选择。然而目前关于城市劳动生产率的研究大多是基于发达国家城市化平稳期假定做出的.这与中国当前发展情境不符。本文在城市产出总量函数中引入了资本存量和产业结构变量.考察快速城市化时期的资本存量、劳动投入、产业结构和城市规模等关键经济变量对城市劳动生产率的影响。基于中国1995—2010年地级以上城市市辖区数据,本文发现:劳均资本存量、产业结构和城市规模等因素对中国城市劳动生产率的提升有显著作用.并且呈现阶段性和趋势性特征。总体上看,资本深化的作用最大但呈缓慢下降态势.产业结构和城市规模的作用为正且呈“倒U型”变动,而人口集聚呈“规模报酬递增”,要素投入呈“规模报酬递减”现象。
提高城市化質量和勞動產齣效率是中國未來經濟髮展的必然選擇。然而目前關于城市勞動生產率的研究大多是基于髮達國傢城市化平穩期假定做齣的.這與中國噹前髮展情境不符。本文在城市產齣總量函數中引入瞭資本存量和產業結構變量.攷察快速城市化時期的資本存量、勞動投入、產業結構和城市規模等關鍵經濟變量對城市勞動生產率的影響。基于中國1995—2010年地級以上城市市轄區數據,本文髮現:勞均資本存量、產業結構和城市規模等因素對中國城市勞動生產率的提升有顯著作用.併且呈現階段性和趨勢性特徵。總體上看,資本深化的作用最大但呈緩慢下降態勢.產業結構和城市規模的作用為正且呈“倒U型”變動,而人口集聚呈“規模報酬遞增”,要素投入呈“規模報酬遞減”現象。
제고성시화질량화노동산출효솔시중국미래경제발전적필연선택。연이목전관우성시노동생산솔적연구대다시기우발체국가성시화평은기가정주출적.저여중국당전발전정경불부。본문재성시산출총량함수중인입료자본존량화산업결구변량.고찰쾌속성시화시기적자본존량、노동투입、산업결구화성시규모등관건경제변량대성시노동생산솔적영향。기우중국1995—2010년지급이상성시시할구수거,본문발현:로균자본존량、산업결구화성시규모등인소대중국성시노동생산솔적제승유현저작용.병차정현계단성화추세성특정。총체상간,자본심화적작용최대단정완만하강태세.산업결구화성시규모적작용위정차정“도U형”변동,이인구집취정“규모보수체증”,요소투입정“규모보수체감”현상。
Improving the quality of urbanization and the labor output efficiency is the inevitable choice of China future economy. However, current researches about city labor productivity are mostly carried out by the assumption of basing period in developed country, which aren't consistent with China current development period. This article introduces capital stock and industry structure in aggregate function of city output to investigate the influence of city labor capital stock, labor input, industry structure and city scale on city labor productivity. Based on 1995--2010 China mutual ground and above city dataset, we find that capital stock per labor, industry structure and city scale have a significant effect on the promotion of labor productivity, which embodies the attributes of periodicity and trend. In general, capital deepening has the most effect on the promotion of labor productivity which drops steadily, the effect of industry structure and city scale is positive which presents as an inverted U sharp, however, there exists the phenomenon of increasing returns to scale in population agglomeration and decreasing returns to scale of inputs.