CAJ | 학술논문

检察机关案例指导制度的推出,反映了中国司法改革的渐进,它是判例制度最终在中国建立的阶段性步骤。现行指导性案例的法律定位不明,缺乏强制力,选编及适用等配套制度不够健全,对司法实践难以发挥有效作用。该制度的完善,必须明确案例作为司法解释原始形式这一法律属性的定位,统一选编主体、规范选编标准、完善编纂体例。在案例适用问题上,应建立当事人提出与上级检察院监督、社会监督等多元化主体机制以及检察官对区别技术的掌握等系列配套制度。
검찰궤관안례지도제도적추출,반영료중국사법개혁적점진,타시판례제도최종재중국건립적계단성보취。현행지도성안례적법률정위불명,결핍강제력,선편급괄용등배투제도불구건전,대사법실천난이발휘유효작용。해제도적완선,필수명학안례작위사법해석원시형식저일법률속성적정위,통일선편주체、규범선편표준、완선편찬체례。재안례괄용문제상,응건립당사인제출여상급검찰원감독、사회감독등다원화주체궤제이급검찰관대구별기술적장악등계렬배투제도。
Guiding cases system reflects that the Chinese judicial reform is conservative,or China begins to gradually establish the case precedent system.The current procuratorate guiding case,whose law orientation is not clear,also lacks binding force and matching system,is difficult to play an effective role in the judicial practice.Improving the prosecution of the case guiding system,should not only correctly understand and position the law attribute of guiding case as a new form of judicial interpretation,but also unify the dominant subject,improve the standard,and perfect the compilation style.It is necessary to establish the parties,social and the superior institute of supervision mechanism,improve the prosecutor’s technology and establish other series of supporting system.