内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版)
內矇古財經學院學報(綜閤版)
내몽고재경학원학보(종합판)
Journal of inner Mongolia finance and economics college
2012年
3期
86~90
,共null页
老子 海德格尔 无 道 存在
老子 海德格爾 無 道 存在
노자 해덕격이 무 도 존재
Laozi; Heidegger; "inaction"; Tao; existence
老子的无即道,海德格尔的无即存在。两者所论无在思想上密切相关,也都有深刻且丰富的思想蕴含。在无与人的关联问题上,两者所论不同,但是都指向了无之神秘。对无之神秘的认同恰恰是他们的思想引人深思之处。
老子的無即道,海德格爾的無即存在。兩者所論無在思想上密切相關,也都有深刻且豐富的思想蘊含。在無與人的關聯問題上,兩者所論不同,但是都指嚮瞭無之神祕。對無之神祕的認同恰恰是他們的思想引人深思之處。
노자적무즉도,해덕격이적무즉존재。량자소론무재사상상밀절상관,야도유심각차봉부적사상온함。재무여인적관련문제상,량자소론불동,단시도지향료무지신비。대무지신비적인동흡흡시타문적사상인인심사지처。
Laozi's "inaction" is Tao and Heidegger's "inaction" means existence.Both of these "inaction" areclosely related and have profound and abundant thoughts.As for the combination of "inaction" and human beings,their opinions are different.But they both aim at the mystery of "inaction".And the identification to the mystery of "inaction" is what their thoughts make people think deeply.