CAJ | 학술논문

传统经验论的缺陷在于认定翻译的对象只是信息而无力回答＂怎样译＂的理论问题。而这个问题的解答是先验的,涉及两个先决条件：语言与文化的悖论、文学文本的信息与言语形式的不可分离性。文学翻译中译入语文本只能近似地还原源语文本的信息与言语形式的和谐统一;由于文学语言具有表达符号意义和完成诗学功能的双重作用,译者的诗学意识方为译艺之魂。
전통경험론적결함재우인정번역적대상지시신식이무력회답＂즘양역＂적이론문제。이저개문제적해답시선험적,섭급량개선결조건：어언여문화적패론、문학문본적신식여언어형식적불가분리성。문학번역중역입어문본지능근사지환원원어문본적신식여언어형식적화해통일;유우문학어언구유표체부호의의화완성시학공능적쌍중작용,역자적시학의식방위역예지혼。
The traditional empirical approach to theorizing translation is defective in that it maintains that the object of translating is simply the message;therefore,it fails to answer the theoretical question of how to translate a text.In fact the answer is transcendental,involving two priori conditions：paradoxes of language and of culture;the inseparability of the message and its speech forms.In literary translating,the translator can only closely restore the harmonious unity of the message and its speech forms in the target text;owing to the two-fold effect of literary language in terms of semiotic meanings and poetic functions,the translator＇s poetic consciousness is the soul of translating.